Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting— 06/13/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 20 <br />by the City's Finance Director Chris Miller and presented in the <br />staff report dated June 13, 2005, seeking Council direction. City <br />Manager Beets noted that each presentation of materials will <br />provide all staff projected and proposed revenues and <br />expenditures, regardless of the source, and would not just be <br />inclusive of levied funds. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the timeframe, noting it <br />appeared to be consistent with past years. Mayor Klausing <br />sought clarification and proposed revisions to the current process <br />from Councilmembers Ihlan and Kough from their city-wide <br />priorities listing # 1 identified as: "Review and control entire <br />budget: Make sure that budget and financial policies are <br />adequate, complete, and being followed; centralize budgetary <br />control by Council." <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her frustration during last year's <br />budget planning process in only reviewing tax-supported <br />programs with the City Budget, exclusionary of other revenues <br />and expenditures (i.e., fee-based programs and services). <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the City Council needed to <br />review and exercise their budgeting authority over all finds, not <br />just those levy-supported to ensure that budget policies are being <br />followed. Councilmember Ihlan further referenced her goal <br />statement and concerns with the Housing and Redevelopment <br />Authority (HR.A} being separate from the City, opining that non- <br />elected officials shouldn't be levying taxes, even if final approval <br />rests with the City Council. <br />Mayor Klausing noted, and staff confirmed, that the City <br />Council, when reviewing the budget, was considering ail funds, <br />including enterprise funds, and other non-tax generated <br />expenditures and revenues. <br />Further discussion included how the lack of consensus among <br />Councilmembers and their priorities and goals impacted budget <br />priorities; Community Development fees restricted to <br />community development activities; fee structures needing to <br />remain commensurate with benefits or services provided; and <br />goal and budgetary control discussions versus identification and <br />approval of specific revenues and expenditures. <br />. <br />