My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0711_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0711_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:23:22 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval: <br />.. <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Manager Review�d: <br />DATE: 7/11/05 <br />ITEM NO.: 6. <br />Agenda Section: <br />Item Descriptio�: Cantinued Public Improvement Hearings far 2005 Pavemenfi Managemen# <br />Program <br />Background: On May 25, 2005, the City Council held a public �earing far the 2D05 PMP. This was <br />for the following neighborhoad: <br />Neighborhood 32: Chatsworth Street (Lovell Avenue to Grandview Avenue} <br />Lovell Avenue {Cul-de-sac to Chatsworth Street} <br />At that meeting the City Council approved the proposed recanstruction of Chatsworth Street. <br />However, the Council moved to table action on Lovell A�enue reconstructzon until t�ie July 11, 2005 <br />City Cauncil meeting and schedulcd Public Hearing to consider reconstruetion optians %r Lovell <br />Avenue to allow furt�ear consideration and negotiations by staff with property owner representatives <br />of Real Life Church and Rose of Sharon Nursing Home. <br />Two aIternatives were presented #o the City Counc'tl at the May 23rd Public Hearing, We have <br />added a third aliernaiive which is the result of discussions with the property owners. <br />R�construct the,rnad_to Cit,y standards: The roadway could be reconstructed to City standards <br />with a cul- c�e- sac at the west end. Due to t�e need foz ernergency vehicIe access and parking <br />the street would need to be built at l�ast 32 feet wide. The costs would be assessed to the <br />properties accarding to the City's assessr�ent policy. The currenfi city policy is to assess 25% <br />of the front footage cost. <br />Alternative 1 Costs <br />Ci Funds $90,922.82 <br />Assessed Amaunt $24,90 i .57 <br />Total Pro'ect Cost $115,824.39 <br />Assessment Rate $41.01/ foot <br />2. Do nothin�: The City could leave the roadway in its present condition. However, t�e <br />condition of this street is deteriorating. The eurrent condition is poor and is in �he need of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.