Laserfiche WebLink
Information Sheet 139 (.Tuly 1998) <br />Pa�e 2 af 4 <br />wasted, Col�ective�y, for a municipali�y with a population of 100,004, fiom <br />$3�0,000 to $500,000 is being lost to the sky every year. <br />This results in not only the �oss of the stars, but an avoidable economic �oss �o the <br />community as well. Uncontrolled lighting of�en creates a garish landscape, with a <br />confusing tangle of ligh�s tha� shine in�o citizens' eyes rather than onto the ground, <br />where it is needed. The term for this obtrusive Iight is "veiling g1a�e", and we are <br />paying extra for it, each and every night the fixtur� is in use. We can da better! <br />This inability to see well in our already over-lit nightscapes due �o glare leads to <br />ever more lighting. The eye is designed to function effectively bo�h day and nigh�. <br />But in our ci�ies, our eyes have to run the gauntlet from lit areas �hat are iniensely <br />illuminat�d to areas of dark shadow� caused by �hose g�ary Iights. The eye will <br />natural�y adjust to the brightest portion of a given scene, often leaving quite <br />adequately lit area� nearby looking dark. <br />Glare and over illumination are thus counterproductive. The mo�re light we use in <br />one area, the more we need everywhere eise beeause the iris in the eye stops <br />down, �etting less light in. Adjacent ar�as (including streets) with formeriy <br />adequate illumination now �ook relatively dim as we ratchei up the light levels in <br />one particu�ar location. �nteresting�y, a lower illumination Ievel provided by a <br />white ligh� source in a fully-shielded f xture would aliow the eye to na�urally <br />adap� to the �ower �ight level, and we could adequately illuminate parking lots <br />with less than one footcandle of illumination. <br />A disturbing new trend seen in some national chains of conven�ence stores and <br />gas �tations has been �o ratchet up the light level under the canopy to very high <br />levels {10,000 times as mueh i�lumination as provided by a full maon!} in an <br />effort to attract customers and provide "a safer, more secure" environment for <br />their employees. For their patranage, customers now ean have the delightful <br />exper�ence of trying to blindly navigate their vehicle for a few �econds onto the <br />much darker streets whiie their eyes readapt. No one wins these escalating "light <br />wars" and our aesthetic environment deterio�ates by the year. Rather than improve <br />safety, these "ratcheteers" have in fact compromised safety. <br />It is time io ha�t this unnecessary and counterproductive escala�ion in lighting �ha� <br />affects us all whether we own ihe lighting system or jus� live near it. After a11, i�'s <br />not rocket science -- it's good �ighting science. autdoor ligh�ing should be <br />regu�ated for the public good, jus� like signs, billboards, and no�se pollution are. <br />Fu11y shielding all outdoor fixtures can eliminate light trespass as well as vvaste. <br />http://www. darksky.org/infoshts/is 139.htm! 6/20/2005 <br />