|
���.;� � � j�� [.� l ����'i�i�T �
<br />Age profile changes
<br />since 1990
<br />■ Preschoolers (Age D-4}
<br />decreased 43% ta 23
<br />_. . • .. '16i)
<br />■ Younger school-age
<br />children (age 5-9)
<br />decreased 25% to 24
<br />• Older children (10-17)
<br />decreased 20% to 45
<br />(Cii�/-TL�i�-�t' d�cJ'�RSc�� 4°�c}
<br />■ Working-age adults (age
<br />18-64) decreased 23% to
<br />258 .'�' ,;;, ... ; ����crea,ed �?'�.}
<br />■ Elderly adults (age 65+}
<br />increased 116% tt� 95
<br />. . , ••� °. i�rci-er�s��� 21 %)
<br />Working Age
<br />■ Early career working-
<br />age (Age 16-29)
<br />decreased 6.0% to 79}
<br />, �..:' LICCI'CiZtiPIL 1�J%/
<br />■ Mid career working-age
<br />(Age 30-54 years)
<br />decreased 16.5% to 147
<br />(Citif-z�!i��e il�creraser� 3 %)
<br />O 1 d e r working-age (Age
<br />55-69 years) decreased
<br />35.7% to 74 [City-wide
<br />[�tC1'ClISL'C� 11 :.:
<br />What do households
<br />look like?
<br />■ 2.56 persons per
<br />household (average),
<br />down from 2.90 in 1990
<br />. � . � ''. , , � � - 7°�oto z.%E7)
<br />■ 27% of all households
<br />have children, down
<br />from 34% in 1990 =-�� .. �
<br />dccren�e�� j��a�ti 25% ta ZZ%}
<br />+ Of all households, 73%
<br />contain families, 20%
<br />have children in fiwo-
<br />parent families, 5% have
<br />single-parents and 21%
<br />have a householder living
<br />alone �- � � . . : 'r�'= I7°'�,
<br />-A;fi Ci1tCt � ' ' . ' �.__ .
<br />Housing
<br />174 occupied housing
<br />units (both owner-
<br />occupied and rental),1
<br />less than in 1990 ,�'r�;. .;;.'.�
<br />ialcrec+sc�d by 1036 fo-1�,59��
<br />Of these occupied
<br />housing units, 2 are rental
<br />(a decrease of 2 units
<br />since 1990), and 172 are
<br />owner-occupied (an
<br />increase of 1 unit since
<br />1990� �{ � ._.� ' 4,750,
<br />: �;,:,.:. ��r 470 r�rtd 9,5�?�
<br />�.r.rr_ .. . . � • :��•• .i�i�:'r.7:�1:. ;i��:.:
<br />=Vacancyrates of non-
<br />rental housing units fell
<br />from 0.58% to 0.00%,
<br />and rental vacancy rates
<br />increased from 0.00% in
<br />1990 to 33.33% ��-�: . �:�•
<br />0.5Go- ��r�T�� 2.3°% i�.�., . ;:, ,•: �:
<br />Racial diversity
<br />increasing since 1990
<br />=Whitepopulation
<br />decreased from 96% to
<br />94% �r'�:. '=..15% :.��'9%)
<br />■Asian population
<br />increased from 2% to 3%
<br />, . . i.`:• 3% fo5°/n)
<br />Black population
<br />increased from 0% �o
<br />•.. �'��• (Cif�f-�oi�a�e 2% to �%}
<br />+Hispanic population �
<br />decreased from 2% to 1%
<br />(Cit�y-��.�zde 1 % to ?%}
<br />■ American Indian
<br />population increased
<br />from� a � to 1% •��=�� •• ,�
<br />sferrcty zvith - •. '.' �
<br />■ 1% of residents are
<br />multiracial (C7ty-�uic�e ="_•�
<br />_Location Map
<br />I �f _' f• ,'a ` t f A' I�I
<br />. .,. ,. '��• c:•.
<br />,,' - -- ..
<br />- •. : '— •" `'„r�• - i
<br />•• Y�•. I
<br />.�. r.,.. _ti ;_: � �
<br />� '.YF� 1 � �. • i
<br />- • • 'r"'. .
<br />�i I
<br />— �.,, z • -_ '
<br />j' ��} Ll� r� ti� CI �Y�TL C�bF 1{� �� -����
<br />• 3�� �,����Jt in 'i1C� [rai7�Clr� �9 �t �! 1� d isiricSs b�� po��.�lafios� con Isin�iig l.��a �f C'i FY Po2 ula.11�n} wy`b �
<br />�acre�sc s�f i�°.b �ic�ce ] U'�. tao��� t�d tp t��s� il]e'� �w� rsll �;r��L�. of 0.6°b
<br />■ Uc�7�se Ln pirac��aL thildrrn and aJ] c�th� r n�r. �rau ps �x�x��` tic�r.�l�+ adul;s, intr��s=.�� ;a}� i lb�. Thr� :s
<br />�,��ma:iL�r niY o�ill� ifl 4i�� � Rtoe��omwns . . . , .
<br />+��'l,rkt7x i� all agt �tr.� �.s dc+cLir�:d, es�eciall� n6�ler �;��i}ce� ,� t'r5°�, re11�t�En� Ce9if�e[[�r.R� �rir:tl ki7� 3��7kfor�s
<br />� 5:�71LFC�r�k �•haC�,eS 5�ifl ���tu- Ln thr n�'xl C�[4S115 SinCe u�e 17e3w 5�[lio� E:f4�S•4'`• �e� c+an�ir���lcrl in 7�fa:��i�^1
<br />�.
<br />�� �: i r�:�,P a,.� �i l,� p-'.c!5 :f7 �I •r.5 ��[Fii �k �!;� � I���, �� �}L'.':i7 fin � r_r�c i r.��, 1��� I.f� ' l•�7�rT7, �'.� Ss!['.IS}:5� rT2fLK �� �
<br />IZosevi]le Comprehensive Plan — 2002 Update Planning District 9 Demographics
<br />
|