My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0718_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0718_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:29:57 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Parks, Open Space, and Pathways (10 times) <br />o Quiet (6 times) <br />• Other qualities that were mentioned four (4) or more times include: <br />o High level of home maintenance <br />o Lower density <br />o Safety <br />o Diversity of residents and housing stock <br />What were the housing-related issues that emerged from the Dialogue? (Source:Small group <br />discussion reports) <br />Affordability of existing and new homes <br />o Tax increases make it difficult for homeowners to iinance ongoing maintenance <br />of their homes. <br />a Newly constructed units are not affordable to seniors and young families. <br />o Lack of high quality, affordable homes <br />• Rental Property <br />o The increasing number of foz-merly owner-occupied housing being converted to <br />rental. <br />a Lack of regulation of rentalproperty—maintenance, occupancy numbers, and <br />social behavior of renters <br />. Planning <br />o Concerns about the increased density of new construciion <br />o Absence of design guidelines for new construction <br />o Apparent lack of planning for secondaiy impacts of new development, such as <br />increase in traffic, off-site drainage/flooding <br />• Communications between City and residents <br />o Residents feel uninformed about: <br />• New development in the city <br />. City responses to complaints of all types <br />What other issues were raised diu�ing the Dialogue? (Source: Small group discussion reports) <br />• Transportation <br />o County Road B <br />Closing the intersection with Hwy. 280 (most opposed closing, but some <br />favored) <br />. Apparent decision to delay general road maintenance cf Cty Rd � <br />o General increase in traffic on residential streets <br />o Management of increased in traffic generated by l��t� developments <br />. Safety/Gime <br />o Crime increases around motel <br />What can the City do to respond to these issues? (Source:Small group discussion reports) <br />. Develop a comprehensive, citywide vision to guide development <br />. Develop City goals for affordable housing and new development <br />South West Area Dialogue 5unmzary p_ � <br />March 15,2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.