Laserfiche WebLink
. Develop incentives far residents to participate in the program <br />. Provide residents with educational materials <br />. Apply Codes enfarcement equitably among single-family and multi-familyhousing <br />. Retain current levels � City maintenance � parks and roads <br />. Develop neighborhood �z�nits on the number of owner-occupied houses that can be <br />converted to rental property <br />Publish Code violations and responses in the "RAP" <br />What can citizen do to respond to these issues? (Source:Fli� ChartNotes) <br />• . Work with City and community organizations to develop opporfuzlifies/pro�ra�xts for <br />— youth to assist those who cannot maintain yards and houses <br />— o Scouts and other youth arganizations can help; earn merit badges <br />— o City should help coardinate the programs to protect vulnerable adults from <br />— scams and to protect yo�tl� doing the wark <br />— o Tap youth employment programs to help older seniars with maintenance <br />— o Tap college labar market to help with maintenance <br />a Develop communications conduits that identify needs and matching resources <br />. Watch out far each other and offer to help facilitate assistance <br />What action ideas were participants willing to support? (Source: Feedback sheets) <br />Six (6) persons indicated that they could personally suppart one ar mare of the issues solution <br />ideas/projects discussed. The ideas/projec�s included: <br />. Code enfarcement—cleaning up unkempt homes and property (3 persons) <br />Most � them (can'tth��k of any we wouldn't) (3 persons) <br />Publishing further info on unkept homes, codes, and phone numbers (2 persons) <br />. Lowering the number of rental properties (lperson) <br />. Keep neighborhoods close and helpful (1 person) <br />Were participants satisfied with the meeting? (Sa�u•ce- Feedback sheets) <br />. �, i �(12) respondents agreed that t11Ey had an opportunity to voice their thoughts during <br />s�nali group discussions. <br />. All (12) persons thought that the dialogue was informative. <br />. Five (5) participants indicated interest in similar dialogues on other citywide topics. No <br />topic was mentioned more than once. Topics mentioned included: <br />o School district issues <br />o Traffic issues on Old ��'vy 8�nd � the area <br />o New projects and issues as they arise <br />North West Area Dialogue 5unmiaiy p 3 <br />March 29, 2005 <br />