|
�
<br />�r.:� �i� i�� ��r��T����`�r �
<br />Age profile changes
<br />since 1990
<br />■ Preschoolers (Age Q-4)
<br />decreased 48% to 65
<br />(City-wide rlecreasecllG%}
<br />■ Younger school-age
<br />children (age 5-9)
<br />increased 3% to 118
<br />=0lderchildren (10-17)
<br />increased 10% to 205
<br />(City-zuide c�ecrea�serT 4°/a)
<br />■ Working-age adults (age
<br />18-64) decreased 24%to
<br />1,025 (Citywide d�ecrea.se�3 4°/a)
<br />■ Elderly adults (age 65+}
<br />increased 30% to 703
<br />(Citi�-�ui�eincreased 21%)
<br />Working Age
<br />■ Early career working-
<br />age (Age 16-29)
<br />decreased 40.9%to 202
<br />(Citywide decrensed 10%)
<br />■ Mid career working-age
<br />(Age 30-54 years)
<br />decreased 171% to 636
<br />(Cif�-wide itzct'easPC� 3%)
<br />■ 01der working-age (Age
<br />55-69 years) decreased
<br />19.3% to 359 (City-wide
<br />dec�•easee� 11 %�
<br />� � F ... • � !N:1.��1 .�. _..--�� .�
<br />What do households
<br />look like?
<br />■ 217 persons per
<br />household (average),
<br />down from 2.41 in 1990
<br />(Citywide decreased � �",• 2.20)
<br />■ 21% of all households
<br />have children, down
<br />from 27%in 1990 City-znt:de
<br />decrer�sed {�•orrz 25% to 22%)
<br />■ Of all households, 60%
<br />contain families,l9%
<br />have children in two-
<br />parent families, 2%have
<br />single-parents and 37%
<br />have a householder living
<br />alone (Cify-wide 59%, �7%,
<br />4% t�77cl.i�' ��: �.�. , -
<br />Housing
<br />■ 912 occupied housing
<br />units (both owz�er-
<br />occupied and rental), 35
<br />more than in 1990 (City-
<br />zvide znc�•er�sed by 1036 to 14,598)
<br />■ Of these occupied
<br />housing units, 145 are
<br />rental (an increase of 40
<br />units since 1990), and 767
<br />are owner-occupied (a
<br />decrease of 5 units since
<br />1990� : ��;,r �. �. `.• 4,750,
<br />. , . . : , •.; hy 470 crn�' 9, 548
<br />i,ure�si���g by 5GG respectively)
<br />'Vacancy rates of n�rt-
<br />rental housing units rose
<br />from 0.52% to 0.78%,
<br />and rental vacancy rates
<br />increased from 3% in
<br />199� t0 6% (City-wide, 0.5%
<br />artd 2.3% respectively)
<br />Racial diversity
<br />increasing since 1990
<br />■ White population
<br />decreased from 98%to
<br />96% �Cl%J7-W1L�295% :i ��°�a�
<br />■ Asian population
<br />increased from 1% to 2%
<br />(C[ft�-z�i�e3%to 5%)
<br />■ Black population
<br />increased from <1%a to
<br />1%(Citywide 2% to 3%}
<br />■ I-�ispanic population
<br />grew slightly to about
<br />1% (Citywidel% to 2%)
<br />■ American Indian
<br />population remained at
<br />C1% (City-wide sfecrd� 2uitli
<br />r, ��,r�
<br />■ 1 % of residents are
<br />multiracial (City-wide 2%)
<br />Location Map
<br />i p:. �.3 �.� r � � �
<br />� 4�<�.
<br />.... �r ; y�;
<br />• �w ti� • � ray ��y
<br />+L{_
<br />I ' �+--�� -�,..
<br />�rt� !� �i • —�" �
<br />��� r ay3
<br />— • - • ---•--•---• -- • •---. . .. . - — .
<br />l'crpulatickn ��r�ta�cl�� I T7hl—�L1�M41. . • . . : . . . , . ' �:. ::::} ! .. :. . ' . .r.•�:.
<br />.}'A •
<br />. i�>' "'J . .
<br />. .r . . . , . �.f� '
<br />.■'',11�i �•tt ]:•' i-• �I71�M1 I � 5.•,I41J7�; �! I!�i tirf.�'_ � t! i�lY'_�l5 �y si(i�n'�i rir�i i�••i7-�: i i r n��f+�j;�i�ir•f: akj' M1jSti�ula I it��? �ivi'.•'_� •�'�. ...
<br />` . — • • r:• ,�,r•.•.,.
<br />.�:��'I 'I'iswlf' �f S}�,r kl L7{•= ��•':'�. �:Q-'��i:�k i � Itk _S�!SL?': _��LS�S i}5'E f� � � tiL''::'� � L�7 QF C�.G{ �•�_'�� ;r ' � t�.y: •,f. . . _. :.
<br />��r•�•- � �.•�' y �•' ' �c;i•,�: f� �
<br />� . . . Y �r�f_, , �.._ if '
<br />� 1�'�[ [e7L��a �.n ji ri••,� :.; �.�: �t ].:Iti'�". G �i'. i-,t'..:.at'•: j'i ���Irlti; �d:1ti:1ti=-r: ; r�;� r;k} ,i-.; �ii��•�8�4�rr �e§i.���5��E+�[��.5��.'}:•}': •:.`-
<br />_ ' • �• ' ,;+ky.:' ' ' • ' 'r � �'' 'I�ti •'- , . . -'•' • �ti��ii ' - '7'� t h ��-}, r.••�: � }�t ;" ��'
<br />'. �1�'�I i_�1i.3_..�: V4' - ��L.t}�{il; [ �. �;rrk�t'7'�M1.J�'�� � t�C:'� I:`.3G. JS'�A7�Lr�?E'��f •� ' •r ,y��� '4• ' �+ci � �' � '� r; '�, �;';:f"f •'rr<'•.
<br />, • ILl _.. : � � _ , '� ' l i . _ , { y : 7 _ ' �•.. .
<br />� �.\r.i;, .�7�k-=.. ��•��i oL�l�a�1'.:LI.3 �C'. h���-i:�.. � .:.� •: . ? •L�'� $ {. ;.;•�-�': . •
<br />1 = ' • ' - • • 'L :� ' : •r: Y �: �; :.� . ., r l .� ;} :. . �,ti K 4�,.�,`. . • ' • ..
<br />+•. {. ��77�� F. . . .'- . Y..- �!" 71l•F �ti}„�.`'-.4[', r �y L1Vt r;,7�7t��:r�y—. , ', • . :'
<br />���..�' 1�{�iL J r_ 1~L{�� �������� L_�1�1 �� ���_'�� �L��� � �11' 35 :l 1rid]0 L� �L {} _ . , �I _��4 �� "i - 7?�yL{4�i'.�4. 'L.': . . .
<br />-�i ti•i•r�:�� �i i,�e •] J.3 y CiIT{ ir. _'L7YiJ Lr��n ki �:�: =='.J 7. •�'{� t!�ilu�[ ��t��li��sl y$`. i� 711� ll?, c: }r.303 SCfli�,•1'c ; r.•�-i �:r.�; :f71+.'i •
<br />Roseville Comprehensive Plan – 2002 Update Planning District 4 Demographics
<br />
|