My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0718_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0718_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:29:57 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:03:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
➢ Better communications, especially Block Captains <br />? City "liaison" or "ombudsman" <br />3 Villa Park— damage, graffiti, renovation <br />➢ It was said that Roseville has a mission statement to mamtain 70%lioir�e ownership <br />Who is responsible to enforce this? <br />12. Should there be similar neighborhood dialogues on other issues? <br />24 Yes 2 No 4 Sort of 2 No Response <br />Ifyes, what would beyourpriority tnpic(s)? t=�r�����rr are grouped by rr°r, �� r,_rt:,�.i <br />➢ Current development going on in our neighborhood <br />➢ Crime Watch <br />� Anything and everything! <br />� Useful interaction and ideas <br />F- Business expansion and traffic <br />� Public transportation <br />y Understanding ihat renters, whether low income or not, are neighbors also <br />9 Traffic <br />� Senior programs <br />y Quality of Lafe (broadarea!) of Roseville—maintaining properties, parks, roads. L,et's see <br />Roseville grow or maintain—not !.��ti� population. <br />� Developmentwithin Roseville—we are land-locked <br />Compilation of Feedback Sheet Respox�ses p_ d <br />South East Area Di�Io�ue (4/26/20D5} <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.