My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0912_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0912_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:41:26 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:04:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��� <br />��'� <br />Memo <br />To: Mayor and Council <br />Neal Beets, City Manager <br />From: Chris Miller <br />Date: September 8,2005 <br />Re: Supplemental Response to Councilmember's Budget Inquiries <br />Dear Council. <br />A few weeks ago, you received a memo, dated 8126105, that addressed some inquiries that were <br />raised during the budget discussions held in July and August. Since that time, a couple of <br />Councilmembers have shared some additional thoughts and perspectives on the 2006 Budget. <br />Given that you will be asked to adopt a preliminary, not-to-exceed budget and tax levy at the <br />9/12/OS Council meeting, I feel that it would be helpful to provide some clarifying information <br />regarding various City Manager budget recommendations. <br />First, I think it is helpful to briefly revisit a few fundamental budgetary concepts including; levy <br />vs. non-levy, one-time vs. recurring expenditures, and the use of reserves as a budget tool. I <br />realize that we have had these discussions in the past, but we continue to observe various <br />members of the Council reaching the wrong conclusion on how municipal finances apply to day- <br />to-day operations. Following that brief overview, I think it's important to look at a few specific <br />areas. <br />Levy vs. Non-levy <br />Certainly all proposed spending ought to receive a high degree of scrutiny. But it is imperative <br />to make the distinction between levy-su�ported programs, and non-levy programs. Preliminary <br />tax levies must be set by September I S''. for the following fiscal year. Once they are set, they <br />cant�ot be increased, but can be lowered. The Final tax levy must be adopted by the end of <br />December for the following fiscal year. Once the final levy is established, it cannot be changed <br />(except under some rare circumstances). This is in stark contrast to fee-based programs, which <br />the City has broad discretion to increase or decrease fees prior to, or throu_� the fiscal year. <br />The distinction between levy and non-levy programs must also be considered when <br />contemplating budget cuts. For example, the elimination of the purchase of recycling bins, the <br />community survey, or the leaf pickup program, does � i�i1 save any tax levy dollars. These <br />particular programs are fee-based. Also, with regard to fee-based programs, the City does i7t�1 <br />have the option of taking fees from one program and using them for some other purpose. In <br />most instances, legal restrictions prevent us from doing so. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.