My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0912_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0912_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:41:26 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:04:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 08/22/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 17 <br />Iliff, 1822 Dale Court, for a Variance to Section 1004.016 <br />(Residential Lot Size Dimensions – Comer Yard Lot Size) of the <br />Roseville City Code (PF 3655). <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion, opining that she <br />could not determine that a hardship issue existed; that the <br />property had been put to a reasonable use for a long time, and it <br />wasn't a hardship that you couldn't subdivide your lot; and <br />expressed concern about the visibility and safety for the <br />neighborhood regarding the site lines, particularly during adverse <br />weather conditions. <br />Councilmember Schroeder spoke against the motion, opining <br />that an exception didn't exist that created a hardship for granting <br />a variance; and that the Council was being asked to create a <br />small lot to erect a small house. <br />— Councilmember Kough cited a similar unique situation on <br />— �aamline and Waad�.zll and the favorable outcome and blending <br />— accomplished with the neighborhood; further opining that he <br />didn't observe a safety factor. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in favor of the motion, as per Planning <br />Commission recommendation for approval; opining that the <br />hardship test had been adequately described and met as outlined <br />in the staff report. Mayor Klausing noted that this accomplished <br />a broader public policy consideration for a first-ring suburb that <br />was substantially developed to provide renewal sources for the <br />City in encouraging smaller and younger family units to remain <br />in the City rather than locating further away. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted that the unique shape of the lot <br />allowed an opportunity to create a smaller home, and anticipated <br />if it would be a marketable lot. Councilmember Maschka opined <br />that the lot was close to minimum lot size, and spoke in support <br />of the motion. <br />Roll C all [8.1 � <br />Ayes: Kough; Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Schroeder. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.