Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting — 08/22/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 29 <br />from RFP to contract stage. <br />City Attorney Anderson suggested language simplified to: "The <br />City will negotiate the terms of the contract." <br />Page 6, Section 3. Background and History <br />Councilmember Sel-Sroeder questioned including "the City of <br />Roseville is looking for a contractor with experience increasing <br />participation in both curbside and multi-family recycling <br />programs". Mayor Klausing said that since this sentence was in <br />the background and history section he was not concerned. <br />Page 12, Section 5, General Requirements for all Collections <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned the need for these <br />specifications, when they were all commercial vehicle <br />regulations specified by Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />(Mn�OT} requirements, and how the City would enforce or <br />dictate such specifications. Councilmember Schroeder <br />advocated making the RFP less detailed and complicated; and <br />suggested deleting the entire 5.02 section regarding collection <br />vehicle equipment requirements. <br />Mr. Pratt noted that this was standard language. <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that the �P, at a minimum, <br />should state that all vehicles must comply with all state and <br />federal regulations. <br />Mr. Pratt noted that 5.02, h) was not a federal or OSHA standard, <br />but his office had fielded numerous complaints related to <br />disposal of driver tobacco ashes. <br />Mayor Klausing, with Council consensus, directed staff to <br />reference OSHA requirements, and include language regarding <br />tobacco receptacles. <br />Page 13, Section 5.03, Pollution Reduction <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that the goals of this section <br />were good, but that they were MPCA requirements and were not <br />enforceable at a city level, thus should not be included in the <br />