Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />5. <br />Accurate, up-to-date job evaluation results are necessarv to remain in compliance with the Minnesota Pay <br />Equity :�41. The City of Roseville is required to file this report by.l,,i7�i;,�}� ? 1.?rl�,�� Preliminary statistics <br />compiled from the report indicate that the City of Roseville is still in compliance with the Act using our <br />current system, but compliance is not as uniform and clear as with the proposed system and only the <br />Department of Employee Relations can make an official determination of compliance. If out of <br />coi�np�ia��ce with the Act, the City will be subject to monetary penalties. <br />The proposed new system has been tested in the Pay Equity system and has passed with an almost perfect <br />pay trend line. In example 1(Proposed Maximum Vs Current Maximum Vs Stanton 5 Maximum), <br />we use a graphic trend line comparison with Stanton 5 cities then to show the relative pay tendencies of <br />comparable cities compared to current pay and proposed pay in Roseville. On individual jobs there may <br />be variation up or down, but when all jobs are compared to a trend line it is possible to observe overall pay <br />tendencies. <br />..1..1Coinpc��satioi� Study12QQ512005 Compensation Anal,ysis 9-1-OS.x1.s <br />Proposed Target Vs Current Target Vs 5tanton 5 Target <br />.u�. <br />�x t* - — <br />.�o-� <br />1+! 8F - • — • • — <br />��94 - -- " — —' ' <br />� IYQ �r � <br />ii � ; = <br />k �x � -._ .. ._.} __. . <br />� L7dm — ` <br />� <br />x <br />�}'197 ,#. — <br />�•�m .. .�_ <br />4'i dd � rt # * . # � * . . <br />]hG� I �'.' . ��' <br />L - <br />FS• ':{ N' JY MC ]L'J• a� +Y 'Y� L'_ <br />���II� F <br />— New Start Rate <br />� 2005 Current Roseville Max W/ Longevity <br />Polv. (New Fi�,�e Year Stepl <br />Proposed New Plan Features: <br />.—., . . <br />� — <br />•ry !L1 7f1 L� �I. 'vJ <br />a New Fi� Year Step <br />� 2005 Grou 5 Max <br />Pniv.�QQ.� Grou�S <br />The recommended new salary program consists of a modified steplmer�t plan in which the step portion is set at <br />97°/o of the S�anton Group 5 marketplace. This 97°/o plan would structure Roseville at just below the average in <br />pay practices utilizing a inore conservative public approach yet also allows for merit pay above the marketplace <br />for those achievers which warrant tk�is, <br />Upon hire, employees would be paid at a start rate based on qualifications within the system. Under some <br />circumstances it may be necessary to hire an employee whose experience exceeds the minimum job requirements <br />and whose salary requirements are higher than the start rate at a rate other than the start rate. Relevant factors in <br />this decision could include the experience and background of the candidate, the market rate for the position, the <br />candidate's salary history, and the salaries of other City staff in similar positions. Human Resources, in <br />conjunction with the hiring department head, determine the starting salary for new employees with the City <br />Manager having final approval. <br />At six months (assuming satisfactory performance) employees receive a pay increase if they start at the entry <br />level step. Employees are then reviewed on their anniversary date, or one year subsequent to their last review, for <br />step increase worthiness. They will move to the next step in their grade if they are meeting job requirements. <br />Increases will be delayed if the employee is not meeting expected performance standards for an employee at that <br />i�o��a Bacon Page Sof9 911512005 <br />