My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0926_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0926_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:05:48 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 09/19/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 2 <br />commercial property in Roseville, he had never requested <br />any public assistance for a project. Mr. Commers took <br />issue with recent comments and misrepresentations <br />regarding his participation in the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment project area. Mr. Commers noted the <br />number of hours daily spent in Roseville, and the <br />significant tax dollars his firm generated within the City; <br />advised that he considered Roseville his corporate home <br />and would continue to maintain his development properties <br />as an asset to the community, as well as a substantial tax <br />base. <br />B. Eminent Domain Update <br />Councilmember Schroeder requested that the City Attorney <br />be directed to provide an update and summary on current <br />law; noting that the City didn't currently have any <br />ordinances or written policy on use of Eminent Domain. <br />Cou�ci�member Schroeder opined that an <br />educationlsumma�-y of Eminent Domain legislation in the <br />state would be helpful, and requested a one-page summary <br />to inform the City Council of the status of applicable law. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that he had previously <br />made this request following the recent presentation by <br />Professor Schultz on the subject of Eminent Domain. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that he was looking for <br />history, advantages and disadvantages and law or <br />application, procedure, and case law as dictated by state <br />law. <br />After discussion, reiterating that the law didn't change with <br />the recent Supreme Court ruling, only reaffirmed City <br />authority in using Eminent Domain, it was Council <br />consensus to have the City Attorney prepare a brief written <br />report; and Councilmember Kough requested any <br />distinctions for use between residential, industrial or <br />commercial properties. <br />2. Hear from Ramsey County Commissioner Jan (Weissner} <br />Parker, Ramsey County Commissioner, District 2 <br />Mayor Klausing welcomed Commissioner Parker; who provided <br />a bench handout of materials and gave an update on current <br />Ramsey County <br />Commissioner <br />Jan Parker <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.