My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0926_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0926_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:05:48 AM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 09/19/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 18 <br />increase; and the need to address the entire budget, not just <br />separate items. <br />Councilmember Kough opined that the Fire Department was a <br />valuable asset to the City; and opined that they are part-time <br />employees; further opining that a pay raise for employees was <br />more important, and something else may need to be cut, and <br />charged the City Manager and Finance Director with achieving <br />the Council's budget direction. <br />Mayor Klausing directed staff to provide additional information <br />to the City Council on specific implementation for possible <br />future action; most likely using a phased approach. <br />8. Discuss 2006 City Budget 2006 City Budget <br />Councilmembers Kough and �h�an requested additional staff <br />input related to various 2006 budget projections (i.e., impact of <br />recycling contract; and reconfiguration of the �T� position; <br />elimination of the Community Development Department <br />Assistant position; and the hiring of a Planning Assistant; and <br />staff returning with specific adjustments for a 5% and a 7.5% <br />levy increase). <br />Councilmember Kough sought additional clarification on <br />specific City Manager budget recommendations. <br />Discussion included various assumptions and perspectives; <br />process for determining a final budget and levy for 2006; target <br />priorities; and achieving target budget without significant cuts in <br />employees a�dlor employee benefits. <br />City Manager Beets noted that he had presented four levy levels <br />in July, utilizing the best guidance and Council consensus and <br />priority information, without additional direction or <br />recommendations from the City Council. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed puzzlement regarding Council <br />expectations of staff; opining it was the Council's duty to ina�e <br />decisions and set priorities; with staff providing expense <br />information for those items not fixed costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.