2005_1024_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Study Session —14117105 DRAFT Minutes - Page 16 Further discussion included reputation of the staff-recommended proposer (Eureka); ranking criteria and Council weighting of those criteria; perceptions of failure of the current provider to perform contracted services; and recommendations of the Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission (PWET). Councilmember Schroeder sought clarification as to other company techniques, innovations and education for comparison purposes; and opined his need for additional information; noting his support for the single sort system. Councilmember Schroeder expressed his personal dissatisfaction with staffs handling of the process in its entirety. Councilmember Ihlan sought additional information on the revenue-sharing component of the proposals. Discussion included calculations of floor prices in the Midwest for revenue sharing projections; vendor options and incentives; policy questions related to revenue sharing monies and their use. Councilmember Schroeder presented a bench handout of his calculations for monthly costs and overall rates, Mayor Klausing sought additional information regarding the rank�ngs and Council weighting; and how staff had performed their individual calculations; and suggested a decision matrix would be helpful. Councilmember Schroeder concurred. Councilmember Maschka advised that he had created his own matrix in evaluating the firms; opining that the real question was whether to use dual or single stream sorting; and further opined that the revenue sharing would be driven by commodities. Councilmember Schroeder advised that he had also performed his own evaluation, as outlined in the bench handout provided to Councilmembers, and reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of specific firms; dual or single stream sort; potential revenues; and philosophical questions. Councilmember