My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1121_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1121_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:31:58 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager's Report <br />Friday, November 4,2005 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />subjects. There were a large number of Parks and Recreation "poli- <br />cies." There were Finance Department "policies" about reserve <br />levels and investment of city funds. These policies were modified <br />by department heads as circumstances changed. The "policies" <br />were compiled in a three-ring notebook. <br />. Sometime around 1990, Council began addressing some of these <br />policies in Council work sessions and staff began compiling the <br />policies in the back of the City's budget book rather than in a 3-ring <br />binder. From time-to-time, staff would revise these policies in light <br />� Council input at work sessions, though no minutes were taken <br />for these work sessions or any other work sessions perhaps because <br />no Council vote or action was taken. In addition to modifications <br />made as a consequence of Council input, staff would continue to <br />make their own modifications to the policies affecting their depart- <br />ment as state law and city budgets and local circumstances <br />changed. <br />. After 1998, we can find no evidence that anyone - Council or City <br />Manager or Department Heads -- was modifying or updating the <br />policies, though copies of policies continued to appear in the back <br />� the budget book. <br />• It would be wrong to say the Council adopted these polices in <br />work/stu�y sessions or budget sessions. Council did not adopt <br />them in work/stuc�y session or budget sessions; Council and staff <br />discussed a few of these policies in wo�rk/study sessions from �ime- <br />to-time. <br />• But talking about City policies and adopting City policies are two <br />different things. This Council, for example, talked about City <br />Council Rules � Procedure for the better part of two years. It <br />would be wrong and misleading, however, to say that this Council <br />adopted Council Rules � Procedure because you talked about them <br />quite a bit. <br />, <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.