Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Neal Beets <br />Mr. Dennis Welsch <br />Mr. Thomas Paschke <br />November 10,2005 <br />Page 2 <br />d} New territory without official controls is annexed to the City <br />Given recent Council discussions, the most pertinent items are items a) and b) above. <br />Note that the statute authorizing a moratorium would only apply if a study is currently <br />underway, �� the Council has authorized a study. Consequently, the Council must, at a <br />minimum, take action to authorize a study before taking any action adopting a moratorium. <br />In my judgment, it is important, before adoption of a moratorium, to not only authorize <br />a"study" in a generic sense, but to define the parameters of the matt�r(s} to be studied. The <br />scope of the study should then relate to the breadth of any adopted moratorium. <br />The statute provides that a moratorium may be in place for one year. While the <br />moratorium can be extended up to an additional 18 months in certain circumstances, those <br />circumstances would not likely exist in the context of a study of subdivisions in Rosev��ie. <br />As mentioned above, and like the study, the Council must clearly identify in any <br />moratorium the uses andlor areas to which the moratorium applies. Would it apply City-wide? <br />To only residential uses/subdivisions? To certain types of subdivisions? To certain sized <br />parcels? To only subdivisions that result in X new lots? Moreover, any moratorium must <br />clearly indicate whether it applies to projects where an application has been filed, but not yet <br />acted on. <br />Note specifically that under Section 462.355, a moratorium cannot apply to a <br />subdivision that has been given preliminary approval. Consequently, a moratorium 4-��rt�I be <br />applied to a proposed subdivision for which application has been made, but not yet acted on. <br />Conversely, the Council could except out of the moratorium all matters where an application <br />has been filed before the effective date of the moratorium. <br />Note also that Section 462.355 provides that a moratorium does not "...extend the time <br />deadline for agency action set forth in Section 15.99." While Section 15.99 does not apply to <br />subdivisions. a parallel provision in Section 462.358 requires action on a subdivision <br />application "within 120 days following delivery of a[properly completed] application." This <br />is important because it dictates the Council take ��,�� action on pre-existing applications. For <br />example, even though the moratorium might be drafted to apply to such an application, the <br />Council should still proceed to deny that application on the grounds a moratorium has been <br />adopted. <br />