Laserfiche WebLink
a. Possible Action Steps: - evaluated annually fo� implementation <br />within budget�esou�ces <br />i. Explore the development of architectural guidelines (a <br />book or brochure of examples) for new x�fi�l single family <br />development and for home additions that add a second <br />floor. <br />ii. Evaluate funding sources to provide architectural assistance <br />(or critiques) to applicants of iz�fl� and second floor <br />additions to ensure that plans blend within the existing <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />4. Policy Statement: Achieve a balance between families with school-aged <br />children and seniors in multifamily housing and the appropriate <br />distribution of acceptable units that are affordable and comvatible with <br />each uniaue Iifes �e. <br />i. Increase opportunities for Young Family Housing through <br />the funding of the Senior Housing Regeneration Program <br />(SHRP) a�d evaluation of additio�al new small lot sin�le <br />fa7maiv sites, — Provided funding in 2005 for SHRP <br />ii. Recommend that the Planning Commission evaluate the <br />,�: ... . benefits and drawbacks of redutein� the existin� reauired <br />`'" �='' lot size to allow for more affordable small lot si��ie <br />familv in�il� develo�ment (similar to Applewood). <br />23 On September 12,2005 the City of Roseville received its 2005 System Statement (see <br />attachment"A") from the MetropolitanCouncil. When issued, the Statementbecomes the <br />starting point for the required 2008 Roseville Comprehensive Plan update. This Statement, <br />based on the 1998 Plan, seeks an increase in housing which translates into increased density. <br />For Roseville this has meant a population increase from 34,500 (2000) to 37,000 (2030) and a <br />housing unit increase from 15,500 (2000) to 17,500 (2030). <br />Growth Management: <br />The Regional DevelopmentF�amewo�ksets an ove�all minimum �esidential density standa�d <br />of 3— S units pe� ac�e in developed and developing a�eas whe�e u�ban se�vice is located o� <br />n ann� . e ave�ag�e minimum standa�d of3 units ae� ac�e is imt�ortant to the efficient use <br />of�egionalsystems,includingwastewate�systeminvestments. Communitiesthatsign�cantdy <br />ove�-size o� unde�-size �egional svstems can cause ineff'zciencies in the use of �egional <br />�esou�ces. Additionally, �rt�r�� ���rr� housing at these ���°r���?k� levels rrtay help communities meet <br />thei� obligations unde� the Met�opolitanLand PlanningAd to plan and add�ess thei� housing <br />needs (page 2, Met�opolitanCouncil System Statement Lette� dated Septembe� 12, 2005). <br />P�3b96 RCA_l 12105.doc Page 4 of 7 <br />