My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1121_Packet SS
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1121_Packet SS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
communities that have not met their Uf goals. These revenues will be used to help de�ray <br />the cost of providing attenuationwithin the MDS to recover the capacitylost to excessive <br />UI. <br />The UI goal establishedfor the Cityof Roseville is the allowablepeak hourly flow rate as <br />shown in Table 1 and varies based on annual average flow. The Council's metering <br />program shows that the city's 2004 annual average flow was 4 mgd. The current UI goal <br />for your community is an allowablepeak hourly flow of 10 mgd. <br />Specific Requirements for the Sewer Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan <br />The Council has cclmp�cted a review of the c�rrent information in the city's existing <br />comprehensive plan and has determined that the following information is needed to <br />update the sewer element of the city's comprehensive p��nl[a�a1 sewer policy plan: <br />� A sewer map showing the city's existing service area and proposed trunk sewer system <br />through 2030 and ultimate sewer service area. <br />. A table showing the projected population, households, employment and flow forecasts <br />by� interceptor for the city for 2010,2020 and 2030. <br />. A description of the city's �li program. What efforts does the city make in the <br />maintenance of its sanitary dispa�a� svste�'? Does the city prohi�it the connection of <br />sump pumps, rain leaders and passive drain tile from the sanitary sewer system? <br />2. Surface W���.� Management <br />In 1995, Minnesota Statutes section 473.859, subd. 2, was amended to make the local <br />surface water management plan required by Minnesota Statute section 103B.235 a part of <br />the land use plan of the local comprehensiveplan. Section 103B.235 provides that a local <br />surface water management plan should be prepared once a watershed plan for the area has <br />been approved. Section 103B.235 also generally identifies the content requirements for the <br />plan. The local surface water management plan must be submitted to both the watershed <br />managementar�ar�iza�ic�n(s} within whose watershed the cam.zz�unit� is located and to the <br />Metropolitan Council for its review. For guidelines on the contents of local surface water <br />management plans, please refer to Append� B2-b of the Council's Water Resources <br />Management Policy Plan. <br />Council records indicate that Roseville is in the Capitol Region and Rice Creek Watershed <br />Districts and the Grass Lake Watershed Management Organization (see attached map). The <br />Grass Lake watershed plan was approved by BWSR in 2001. The Rice Creek and Capitol <br />Region watershed plans were approved by BWSR in 1997 and 2000 respectively. <br />Rosevilleupdated its 1oea1 surface water managementplan in 2003. The city should be <br />advised that the_y will need to review their current local surface water management plan <br />against the p�Fi�te� and required elements of the Water Resout-ces Management �'��+�r�}� <br />Plan. If there are discrepancies, the city will need to revise its local surface water <br />Y� - � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.