Laserfiche WebLink
The Council is reminded that the Water Fund is in a relatively weak financial position compared <br />to other utility funds and even the City's General Fund. Above-inflation increases in water rates <br />will be needed for the foreseeable future to improve this condition. <br />Sanitarv Sewer Operations: The City maintains a sanitary sewer collection system to ensure the <br />general public's health and general welfare. The single largest operating cost to the sanitary <br />sewer operation is the treatment costs paid to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services <br />Division (MCES). The MCES has notified us that our treatment costs are expected to increase <br />by approximately 3% in 2006. In addition, the City's internal operating costs are expected to <br />increase by approximately 1% reflecting slightly lower planned capital replacements from the <br />previous year. <br />Unlike the Water Fund, the Sanitary Sewer Fund is in a relatively strong financial position which <br />will somewhat offset some of the operating cost increases. <br />Storm Water Drainage Operations: The City provides for the management of storm water <br />drainage to prevent flooding and pollution control, as well as street sweeping and the leaf pickup <br />program. The storm sewer costs are expected to somewhat higher than in previous years, due to <br />the planned replacement of Stormwater systems. In an effort to ensure adequate funds are on <br />hand for these replacements as well as other operating costs, an increase in the rates will be <br />needed. <br />Recycling Operations: The recycling operation provides for the contracted curbside recycling <br />pickup throughout the City. The primary operating cost is the amounts paid for a contractor to <br />pickup recycling materials. The 2006 contract will allow recycling rates to remain at their 2005 <br />levels, and should limit the increase for 2007 to a less-than-inflation amount. <br />Recommendation <br />After reviewing the needs of the various enterprise-type operations and the current rate structure, <br />Staff feels a rate adjustment is warranted. This is based on the following: <br />1) The City will realize a 3% increase from various service providers including the City of St. <br />Paul, and MCES <br />2) The City is projecting a 3% increase in City-controlled operating costs <br />3) Substantial capital replacement costs will be incurred in the next several years that will <br />require both the use of existing reserves, as well as planned rate increases <br />4) The City has fixed costs that it must recoup independent of the amount of citywide usage <br />5) The City has typically applied rate adjustments on an equal percentage basis across various <br />property types <br />After a brief discussion, the Council agreed to accept Staffs recommendation. A resolution to <br />adopt the recommended rates is attached. <br />Council Action Requested <br />Adopt the attached Resolution establishing the 2006 Utility Rates. <br />