My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_1205_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_1205_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:04:27 PM
Creation date
9/14/2009 10:10:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting-11/28/OS <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 15 <br />inspection. <br />What about owner availability for and timing of inspections? <br />Staff response: Staff will accommodate schedules with owners <br />wherever possible, even potentially in the evening or on <br />weekends. <br />Are owner-occupied homes really subject to maintenance <br />issues? <br />Staff response: Yes, in some instances. While the City is not <br />currently inspecting owner-occupied units, unless a complaint is <br />brought to staffs attention; there is a need for rental housing <br />inspections even in owner-occupiedunits to ensure compliance. <br />How can tenant behavior be regulated? <br />Staff response: Through possible addendums to lease <br />agreements, with application of state statutes for certain <br />provisions (i,e,, gambling, prostitution, etc.). <br />What if current lease language clearly states "n� <br />inspections?" <br />Staff response: Depending on lease language, an addendum <br />could be added due to a change in local ordinance. <br />Why not include all rental property? <br />Staff response: The HRA considered this issue, but at this time, <br />most complaints were single-family rental units. Future <br />expansion may be considered. <br />Council Comment, Questions, Discussion <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested that staff provide a comparison <br />chart, prior to City Council action, of specific differences in the <br />City's standard of maintenance and that of the IPMC. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted this was in response to several <br />public concerns previously expressed to her; as to whether the <br />City's standards are higher than that of IPMC; and how onerous <br />the proposed Code would be (i.e,, whether the City needed to do <br />a full-scale over hall, or enforce what was already on the books). <br />Councilmember Ihlan also sought clarification as to whether both <br />a property maintenance code and a rental licensing scheme were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.