2009_0914_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of ��,� � � �I Minnesata, USA Regular City Counci� Meeting Min�tes Cr`t� Hall Caunc.il C�ambers, 2660 Civic Cenfier Drive Monday, June S, 2049 1. Call Roli Acting Mayor Rae called to order the Roseville City Council regular meeting at ap- proximately 6;00 p.m, and welcomed e`veryone. (Voting and Seating Order for June: Johnson; Pust; 7hlan; Koe and Klausing) Acting City Manager Chris 1Vliller advised that City Iv�anager Malinen had been called away unexpectedly this afte�noon and �v�s unsure if he would be able ta return for to- night's rneeting, Acting Mayor Rae noted that Mayor Klausing was exc�sed; having previausly noted his unavailability to attend tonight's meeting. City Attorney Scott Andersan was also present. Closed Exec�tiv� Session — Discuss A.cquisition of portions of property Iocated at 2690 Cle�veland Avenue anc� 1947 Cauniy Road C for road right-of-wa� pt�rposes City Attorney Scott Anderson re�viewed the purpase of the Closed Executive Session related to the attorney/client privileged and confidential �ppraisal informafion in accardance with Minne- sota Statute, Section 13D.01; and Minnesota Statute 13D.0�, subd. 3.c respectively, City Attor- ney Anderson noted that the meeting would be tape recarded with the tape held by the Ciiy At- torney untit deemed appropriate, if applieable, for public dissemination. .�ohnson moved, Pust seconded, recessing the meeting inta Closed ��ecutive Session, at 6:08 p,m., in accordance with Minnesota Statuie, Section f 3D.01, for the Cit� Council, staff, and legal caunsel to c�iscuss attarney/client privileged information and confide�itial information related to a discussion regarding offers for the purchase of portions of 2690 C1e�veland Avenue, �nd 1947 County Road C from Raseville Acquisitions �,L� and to include �innes�ta Statute, Section 13D,05, subd. 3.c for closure to discuss real property fhat may be subject to an c�ffer or counter- offer to purchase. Councilmember Ihlan advised that she rvould be voting against the motion; since Open Meeting Law did nat require closur�, and since this �vas an important public issue, she opined that there was no need for secrec� at this point. Acting Mayar Roe noted it was t.he option of the City Council whefk�er ta close tl�e meeting for this discussion; however, he opined that it was in the Cit�'s best interests in discussing offers a�d potential counter-offers ta do so in clased session. Acting Mayor Roe advised thafi any potential