CC_Minutes_2009_1012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Furthermore, these roads, including Fairview Avenue to the north are residential neighborhoods, neighborhoods the City Council and City Government should be working to protect and enhance rather than degrade and destroy with wider streets and increased traffic. Now, the City Council, nearly 30 years after this Parkway was designed, is planning to increase our debt service by moving to acquire a portion of land to open the proposed Parkway to Fairview. This is not based on need. There is no development planned at this time save the hotel and the Park and Ride along Cleveland Avenue. McGough owns the interior site which has access both at the end of the present Parkway development and across its own property to Fairview Avenue. There is no need for the City to provide any further work. In fact, the initial plan proposed by McGough did not favor the continuation of Twin Lakes Parkway beyond the edge of the property thus providing access to the site from Cleveland and 35W without having the development plans altered by preexisting roadways. The Hagen property being proposed for purchase will divide the Hagen parcel actually limiting its potential development and use. Again, it presently has excellent access to Fairview Avenue before Fairview goes north into residential neighborhoods. The City has no need to provide additional access to either of these existing parcels. If and when either of these sites have firm and accepted plans and development proposals, decisions about the future of the Parkway should be made. These decisions should not be made now. There are no plans for any further development. We have the reality of a floundering economy and a city struggling with rising expenses and shrinking revenues. This is not "a field of dreams" and we are in no position to pretend that it is. There is no need to purchase the Hagen pazcel. The City's position has always been to keep hands off development and in this case it should be continued. To purchase a portion of the Hagen parcel for the continuation of Twin Lakes Pazkway is certainly not in the best interest of Roseville or it residents. In fact, it stands to simply provide additional expenses for the creation and continued maintenance of the Parkway and revenue reductions due to the degradation of the residential neighborhoods to the north along Fairview Avenue. This discussion flows seamlessly into our current budget fiasco. To date there has been no proposed budget available to the public. If one has been provided to the Council it should have been made available to the residents. What passed as a budget prior to the aborted "hearings" last month was the worst I have seen in the last 20 years or more. The staff and Council would only have to look back some 10 years to so to see what a budget should look like. A budget should tell us where we have been and what we have spent. It should tell us what our specific unchanging obligations are for the coming year. It should provide as accurate as possible estimate of potential revenues. It should then provide a listing of those items, in some prioritized manner, which could be handled should monies be available. And, in this economy and with a very large portion of our population on a fixed income that is not increasing at all for the next two years, any additional spending should be looked at very carefully. 2