My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_1109_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_1109_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:28:54 PM
Creation date
11/5/2009 4:20:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval <br />��. �: � <br />Item Description <br />l�'�, <br />Jy <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Discussion on Alternative Revenue Sources <br />Date: 11/09/09 <br />Item No.: 10.a.2 <br />City Manager Approval <br />� / <br />BACKGROUND <br />At the May 11, 2009 City Council meeting, Staff presented a brief overview of alternative revenue sources <br />that could be used to support the City's 2010 programs and services. These alternative revenues would be <br />especially helpful in offsetting the expected loss of $450,000 in Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC), <br />and in ensuring the City's long-term financial sustainability. <br />City Staff has identified a number of potential revenue sources that are in use in other municipalities and <br />that could be implemented in Roseville. We have also identified some potential sources that would offset <br />specific program costs. They include (but are not limited to): <br />❖ Gas and/or electric franchise fee <br />❖ Street light utility fee <br />❖ Continued regional cooperation efforts <br />❖ Special services district assessments <br />❖ Commercial police patrol fee <br />❖ Increase business licensing fees <br />❖ Increases fines <br />❖ Vehicle towing fees <br />❖ Animal recover/transport fee <br />❖ Home security check fee <br />❖ Increase business alarm fees <br />❖ Student enrollment fee <br />These new revenue sources not only could be used to offset the loss of MVHC, it could also provide greater <br />transparency in demonstrating the amounts needed to fully recover program costs. In addition, they could <br />be used to strengthen the City's asset replacement funding mechanisms. <br />Individually, these revenues sources, such as the vehicle towing fee might garner as little as $10-20 per <br />occasion. Sy contrast, if the City enacted a street light utility it could be set at such a rate to generate <br />$300,000 annually. Gas and electric franchise fees would garner even more. A 1% franchise fee charged to <br />gas and electric customers would equate to approximately $620,000 annually. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.