My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1109
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:31:32 PM
Creation date
11/23/2009 1:31:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 09, 2009 <br />Page 9 <br />zens as their representatives; and suggested that it may make more sense <br />to look at Parks and Recreation Marketing as a possible way to restore <br />funding for ice rinks, or at least a portion of them. Councilmember Roe <br />spoke in support of restoring funding for all neighborhood ice rinks. <br />Along those lines, Councilmember Ihlan noted, on the last page of the <br />budget below the yellow line, noted the "other" category ranked as a 1 by <br />the City Council, with staff ranking it high and its appearance in the ad- <br />justed budget; and suggested there may be some room for adjustment in <br />order to preserve outdoor ice rinks. <br />City Manager Malinen reiterated the purpose of content of the "other" <br />categories, with staff having left that item as identified in the Springsted <br />Report, and representing numerous items that were inherent to each de- <br />partment's day-to-day operations. However, Mr. Malinen suggested that <br />in the future staff would need to be more methodical in defining the <br />"other" category, rather than the current accounting/rounding system. Mr. <br />Malinen advised that, in this first go around, the skating rinks were a large <br />number, with large revenue off-set. <br />Councilmember Johnson, in reviewing the Police Department Administra- <br />tion category, noted 2008 and 2009 final budget figures; but noted the lack <br />of any substantive figures for 2009, while still budgeting for 2010 and the <br />apparent $141,000 discrepancy. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the 2009 final numbers reflected the loss of State <br />Aid, and represented the amended budget in the spring of 2009; with the <br />Police Department budget an example of reallocating annually where cer- <br />tain personnel were assigned. Mr. Miller advised that there was a change <br />during that 2009 for one FTE from police patrol to police administration. <br />Mr. Miller noted that personnel costs increased by 3% in 2008; however, <br />advised that the increase would have been larger if the allocation had not <br />been switched from patrol to administration. <br />Councilmember Johnson sought comparison information for the Police <br />Department between 2008 and 2009; and whether this represented a con- <br />tingency account and how staff allocated such a contingency. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the City only kept a generic contingency account, <br />which was not earmarked for any one department, but available through- <br />out the year as needs indicated. <br />Councilmember Johnson requested a copy of the 2008 actual and proposed <br />budgets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.