My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2009 11:20:55 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 11:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />Page 17 <br />Further discussion included the status of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) <br />set up as an endowment fund with the City basing annual maintenance and recon- <br />struction on the interest earnings, as it was set up to do in the 1980's by previous <br />City Councils, with contributions diminished or eliminated at some point and in <br />an effort to avoid issuing bonds for repairs and replacements, a common practice <br />in many municipalities, with the fund currently at approximately $13.6. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that while it may be legal to use reserves, the City was <br />only deferring future capital improvements by transferring that money for opera- <br />tional costs and not meeting short and long-term capital needs. <br />City Manager Malinen, in response to public comments about the BFO process, <br />admitted that it was not a pure BFO process at this time, but had been used as an <br />initial step in identifying and prioritizing those things that were important to the <br />community, recognizing that the current budget process was no longer sustain- <br />able. Mr. Malinen noted that the 2009 budget had essentially no increases from <br />that of 2008 other than personnel cost increases; and that the 2010 budget did es- <br />sentially the same thing, freezing adjusted 2009 spending, other than newly- <br />mandated items. Mr. Malinen advised that the City was doing what the public <br />speakers suggested, working off numbers and budgets several years old, in addi- <br />tion to the 2009 cut of $450,000 when the MVHS was "unallotted." Mr. Malinen <br />noted the $900,000 in obligatory funding to pay back the State of MN for 2009 <br />and 2010 tax credits; with limited remaining funds being directed toward capital <br />improvements (i.e., vehicle replacement); while attempting to deal with the ongo- <br />ing structural issues from past budgets. Mr. Malinen sought the public's patience <br />in improving the BFO process for the next budget cycle, with staff keeping notes <br />on how to achieve that improvement. Mr. Malinen thanked the public for their <br />comments and their attendance; and encouraged them to ask questions of the staff <br />whenever. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned what the next iteration of the budget would look <br />like, noting that the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing was coming up soon, and <br />line items should be available. <br />Mayor Klausing advised that the Council and staff would continue moving toward <br />a final budget; and suggested that if Councilmember Ihlan was supporting a zero <br />percent levy, she provide staff and fellow Councilmembers with her specific pro- <br />posals to accomplish that, expressing his interest in seeing those recommenda- <br />tions. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that a zero percent levy was not coming from one <br />person, and if the Mayor was looking for someone to step forward with alterna- <br />tives, she could not do so, but could come back with ideas, if she had line item de- <br />tail. Councilmember Ihlan opined that it would be a team, not individual, effort; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.