My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2009 11:20:55 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 11:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />Page 20 <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon summarized the request of <br />Clearwire for erection of a 150' tall telecommunication tower on the City Hall <br />Campus as a CONDITIONAL USE, with staff recommending approval, with <br />concurrence of the Planning Commission. Mr. Trudgeon clarified that this was a <br />land use issue before the City Council at this time, along with the City serving in <br />their role as property owner. Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff's recommendation <br />for approval was based on whether it met code, Conditional Use criteria, and was <br />predicated on staffls analysis as detailed in Section 7 of the report dated Novem- <br />ber 16, 2009. Mr. Trudgeon advised that, if approved, future discussion by the <br />City Council on lease terms and other items would then be forthcoming. Mr. <br />Trudgeon noted that a representative of Clearwire was present at tonight's meet- <br />ing. <br />Discussion included lack of public comment at the Planning Commission Public <br />Hearing related to this request, and focused on the proposed tower at Acorn Park. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed concern on the proposed location of the tower on <br />the campus and visual aesthetics; opining that there must be another location on <br />campus that would accommodate the tower and be less visible; while speaking in <br />support of the commercial enterprise. Councilmember Pust spoke in opposition to <br />this proposed location, opining that it would be an eyesore and that she didn't <br />want that presentation to the community. <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed four other locations on campus that were considered by <br />several staff members, with this being the recommended location. <br />Mayor Klausing recognized Councilmember Pust's concerns, and the original re- <br />quirement that the towers be located on public land to allow greater control and <br />discretion as to their locations. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that they were not required to be located on public land, <br />but as a Conditional Use on industrial, business or commercial properties as well. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the City would lose revenue if the tower were located <br />on land other than public land; however, noted that that this didn't factor into the <br />land use analysis and understood the aesthetic issues, while recognizing the vi- <br />ability of them as a utility and needing accommodation. Mayor Klausing ques- <br />tioned whether the balance in additional revenue served as a trade-off for aesthet- <br />ics, in addition to providing a public service. <br />Councilmember Johnson opined that, while supporting the tower on campus, aes- <br />thetically this was the worst possible location and suggested consideration be <br />given to placing the tower within the Public Works yard. <br />Tony Vavoulis, Clearwire Representative <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.