Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Additionally, we believe the existing rental stock plays a critical role in providing (indirectly) af- <br />fordable housing to moderate-income households. Efforts to maintain and/or improve the quality <br />of these older properties may be needed in order to continue to provide high-quality housing that <br />meets the needs ofmoderate-income households. <br />Senior Housing <br />As illustrated in Table CR1, strong demand exists for senior housing in the City of Roseville. Al- <br />though Roseville already has an array of senior housing options, much of the forecast growth in <br />Roseville is a result of the existing population base aging into the older adult and senior age co- <br />horts. Development of additional senior housing is recommended in order to provide housing <br />opportunity to these aging residents in their stages of later life. The types of housing products <br />needed to accommodate the aging population base are discussed individually in the following <br />section. <br />Before moving forward in our discussion, it is important to note that similar to other established <br />suburbs in the Metro Area, the age distribution is weighted toward the older adult and senior co- <br />horts. The development of additional senior housing serves atwo-fold purpose in meeting the <br />housing needs in Roseville and other established communities: older adult and senior residents <br />are able to relocate to new age-restricted housing in Roseville, and existing homes and rental <br />units that were occupied by seniors become available to other new households. Hence, devel- <br />opment of additional senior housing does not mean the housing needs of younger households are <br />neglected; it simply means that a greater percentage of housing need is satisfied by housing unit <br />turnover. <br />Active Adult Rental - !n the near-teen, we recommend development of an 80 to 90 mixed- <br />incorae active adult rental project in the City of Roseville. Currently, no market rate or <br />affordable (i.e. shallow subsidy) active adult rental housing is available in the City. Older <br />adults and seniors who desire these housing products have either been forced to relocate to <br />other communities outside the City of Roseville or are residing at general occupancy rental <br />projects. We believe amixed-income building would be an ideal development concept to <br />create the most dynamic, inclusive community for active seniors and to temper stigmas and <br />potential neighborhood opposition of affordable housing development. <br />Due to the current recession and housing market slowdown, many markets have experienced <br />delays in realizing demand for market rate active adult housing. These delays are the result <br />of seniors who choose not to sell their homes or find they are unable to sell their homes, <br />along with the fact that active adult rental housing is not need-based. While the affordable <br />component of the mixed-income building could be built as soon as this year, we recommend <br />that development delay until 2011 in order to allow the market to regain momentum. Alter- <br />natively, the project could be built in two phases (with affordable housing in the first phase) <br />or, less ideally, developed separately due to the conditions. <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 92 <br />