My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2009 11:20:55 AM
Creation date
12/4/2009 11:20:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />9. General Ordinances for Adoption <br />a. Adopt an Ordinance Approving the 2010 Fee Schedule <br />Finance Director Chris Miller summarized the annual Request for Council Action <br />dated November 16, 2009, detailing staff-recommended adjustments to the Fee <br />Schedule establishing fees and charges for services of the City's regulatory func- <br />tions, following staff's comprehensive review of those fees. Mr. Miller advised <br />that staff was only recommending establishment of two new fees to offset costs <br />currently funded by non-program revenues, including pathway patching fees and <br />engineering-related fees for plan review and permits. <br />Discussion among staff and Councilmembers included recommended increase of <br />$5 in the leaf pick-up program for 2010 to more completely cover the program <br />costs through fees to reduce taxpayers subsidizing the program. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern that, since the City would pick up leaves <br />regardless to keep them out of the stormsewer, this increase seemed to set the <br />residential service up to fail based on ever-increasing fees, making it less and less <br />affordable and unavailable for those needing the services. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that she would prefer to see this program made available to all, with costs <br />for the program spread across the community via sewer fees. Councilmember Ih- <br />lan further opined that this program was unique to Roseville and appreciated by <br />program participants. Councilmember Ihlan questioned the basis for the recom- <br />mended $5 fee increase. <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz advised that the recommended increase <br />was to off-set the subsidy portion; with the assumption that the City receives a <br />benefit from the program after the $45,000 program costs to clean gutters and <br />streets, with this fee an attempt to pick up the remainder from participants of the <br />program. Mr. Schwartz advised that program participants remained steady, with <br />approximately 12 - 1300 residents using the program; and further noted increased <br />costs of running the program due to inflation, equipment and staff costs. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that Councilmember Ihlan made some good points; how- <br />ever noted the extensive discussions held by previous City Councils, as well as <br />the current body, in addition to review by one or more advisory commissions; <br />with the current program balancing interests of program participants and that of <br />the entire community. Mayor Klausing opined that continuing the program was a <br />wonderful asset to the community, helped in making it a welcoming community, <br />and remained of value. However, Mayor Klausing further opined that there was a <br />need to ensure that costs came closer to those benefiting most directly; and clari- <br />fied that the City picked up leaves in the storm gutter, but this allowed partici- <br />pants to place their leaves on the boulevard for pickup by the City. <br />Councilmember Roe noted comments last year from a resident stating that the <br />City and his waste hauler were very competitive in providing this service. Coun- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.