CC_Minutes_2009_1123 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 23, 2009 Page 15 cil's attention once again, cautioning them about spending reserves for short-term needs, ultimately pushing off that burden to the next generation. Councilmember Roe noted the substantial funding gaps represented in the ten- year CIP, based on existing monies, projected needs, and projected property taxes. Councilmember Roe noted that, even with incredible interest returns that the City might realize, the City was not even close to funding those capital needs with re- serves; and advised that he would not support such a suggestion; opining that to continue spending reserves was an unsustainable practice. Mr. Miller concurred, noting the approximate need annually of $1 million for overall vehicle replacement. Councilmember Johnson questioned the process for final budget adoption from the preliminary budget. Mr. Miller advised that the City Council would be asked to finalize the budget at the December 21, 2009 meeting, two weeks after the Truth in Taxation hearing. Councilmember Johnson advised that he had fundamental problems with the pro- posed budget as it stood, based on appropriations; opining that this budget was a broad stroke versus line item process; and he doesn't feel he's been provided with sufficient information to appropriately allocate funds from one department to an- other without fully understanding those impacts. Councilmember Johnson ad- vised that he had consulted with City Manager Malinen regarding those reserva- tions, and wanted to alert his Council colleagues that he would not support this budget unless he received that additional information. Councilmember Johnson reviewed his request for additional information on "other" categories as an exam- ple, and lack of information on differences (i.e., Police Department taken from $166,000 to $56,000). Mayor Klausing advised that this was one patrol position not filled. Councilmember Johnson opined that he didn't have sufficient information at to- night's meeting that would allow him to reallocate monies and do the budget jus- tice; and questioned his colleagues on whether he'd have another opportunity to discuss the budget, and see responses from City Manager Malinen on his sugges- tions and subsequent impacts. Mayor Klausing expressed his personal frustration that Councilmembers believed they were not receiving sufficient background information, when any individual requests of staff that he'd made had been readily fulfilled or received responses. Mayor Klausing opined that, if a Councilmember was not supportive of the City Manager-proposed budget, it was their responsibility to propose an alternative. For example, by making a shift from one department to another department, and