My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2009 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
12/11/2009 9:08:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />Page 18 <br />ward, rather than individually try to determine where to make reductions or real- <br />locations, unless providing broad guidance to staff on their suggested changes, by <br />seeking a majority vote of the City Council at the time of final levy adoption. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his desire to get the City Council to a budget resolu- <br />tion, but opined that he was stymied as to how to reach that conclusion. Mayor <br />Klausing suggested that Councilmembers provide their preferred dollar amount <br />and comfort level. <br />Councilmember Pust advised that she was not prepared to bring forward a motion <br />on a different dollar amount, understanding that it was up to Councilmembers to <br />make suggestions through the BFO process for the City Manger to revise for the <br />next round of discussion. Councilmember Pust advised that she wanted to fund <br />outdoor ice rinks, and thought this could be accomplished by the City Council <br />giving up their salaries. Councilmember Pust expressed her preference, while not <br />a line item, but built into the process, for freezing and eliminating overtime, <br />which would allow the City to retain their important staff, while reducing the <br />budget by approximately $200,000; her preference for a hiring freeze similar to <br />that instituted in 2009, if it had been lifted. <br />Mr. Miller advised that several key positions were replaced, but many had not <br />been replaced and remained vacant. <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that a hard hiring freeze be put back in place to <br />protect current staff, while recognizing that they would be further inconvenienced <br />with a freeze on overtime, but opining that it must be done given the current <br />economy. <br />Councilmember Pust stated if administration numbers indicated all staffing costs <br />in each department, and if there was other money in those administrative num- <br />bers, that those costs be trimmed as much as possible, (i.e., training, overtime), <br />but done across the board in some equitable way. Councilmember Pust, on page 2 <br />of the ranking matrix and under the yellow line, suggested a hard freeze on infla- <br />tionary increases for all 2010 projected numbers in a total amount of approxi- <br />mately $100,000, including overtime costs if not affecting people's jobs, or inad- <br />vertently putting someone on a pink slip list. <br />Councilmember Johnson advised that he felt very strongly about his individual <br />suggestions made to City Manager Malinen previously for budget allocations; and <br />that he felt so strongly that he was going to base his vote to support the proposed <br />budget on whether those items were included or not. Out of courtesy to his col- <br />leagues, Councilmember Johnson advised that he was bringing this up now rather <br />than holding the whole process at bay. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.