CC_Minutes_2009_1123 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 23, 2009 Page 7 Councilmember Ihlan expressed frustration that she had not yet received the line items and budget worksheets to support the budget expenditure summaries, as she had requested at two previous meetings; and had not found the information posted on the City's website. Mr. Miller reiterated City Manager Malinen's response from the last meeting when the information had been requested, that there was no 2010 line item pre- pared as had been done in previous years, with staff focusing on program-type budgeting over the last few months. Mr. Miller further reiterated that Mr. Ma- linen and he had advised Councilmembers and the public that the 2009 line items budget, posted on the website, had changed little for the 2010 proposed budget; and that those few changes were highlighted in orange and blue on the 2010 prior- ity ranked budget matrix. Councilmember Thlan expressed concern that, without the documents all in one place, it was difficult to understand where changes were reflected between 2009 and 2010; and if most categories hadn't changed, why decreases or increases were listed on the budget summaries. Councilmember Ihlan advised that she was pre- pared to make a formal motion to get this information at tonight's meeting; opin- ing that she had to have those itemizations behind the figures in the summary; fur- ther opining that it was public information, and if her motion failed or there was no response to it, she was prepared to make a public information request; further opining that this was public information that was desperately needed. Ihlan moved, Pust seconded, that the City Council direct staff to produce line item breakdowns or budget worksheets for 2010 budget by the end of this work week, Wednesday, November 25, 2009, to allow the City Council to work on them be- fore the Truth in Taxation Hearing, as previously requested at the last two meet- ings; and that the information be provided to Councilmembers electronically, and posted on the City's website for public information. Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion; opining that it had been ad- dressed in the past, and did not serve to move the City Council forward in terms of a comprehensive budget discussion. Mayor Klausing opined that the discus- sion needed to hinge on what general programs and services valued by the com- munity and which were most important to individual Councilmembers and by consensus, to the majority. Mayor Klausing admitted that this first attempt at a Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) process had been [less than] perfect, but had been helpful in forcing the City Council and public to review what was done and de- termine our priorities within that framework. Mayor Klausing concurred with staff that the information was available on the website for 2009; and opined that the City Council could make budget decisions on the information provided to- date.