Laserfiche WebLink
Frequently Asked Questions About IRV <br />candidates, allowing a candidate with less overall support to prevail. <br />IRV allows those voters to rank all of their candidates and watch as <br />votes transfer to their candidate with the most support. In partisan <br />races, IRV prevents the possibility of a third party candidate "spoiling" <br />the race by taking enough votes from one major candidate to elect the <br />other. <br />Does IRV save money'? Yes. Traditional two-round, "delayed" runoffs <br />are common around the country. IRV halves the cost of those elections <br />because it determines a majority winner in a single election. Before <br />adopting IRV, for example, San Francisco spent as much as $2 million <br />on each election in its delayed runoff, and statewide runoffs in places <br />such as Texas cost far more. In addition, many states and cities use two <br />rounds of special elections to fill vacated seats and instead could elect <br />a popular winner with IRV in one round of voting. In such situations <br />IRV also reduces the reliance of candidates on special interest donors <br />because they only have to campaign and raise money for one election <br />rather than two. <br />Does I RV affect voter turnout? Yes. Turnout generally increases. <br />IRV gives every voter incentive to participate because your vote still <br />counts even if your first choice candidate is defeated. Also, since IRV <br />only requires one election, the decisive election takes place when <br />turnout is highest, typically November. <br />Does IRV affect campaign debate? Yes. Because IRV may require <br />second and third choice votes to win, candidates have incentive to <br />focus on the issues, to attract voters to their positions and to form <br />coalitions. Negative campaigning and personal attacks are much less <br />effective in an IRV election. <br />W/aere is IR V used? Many places. Ireland uses IRV to elects its <br />president, Australia to elect its House of Representatives, London to <br />elect its mayor, San Francisco to elect its major city offices such as <br />mayor, Utah Republicans to nominate congressional nominees at its <br />state convention, many maj or universities for their student government <br />elections and the American Political Science Association to elect its <br />president. Literally hundreds of jurisdictions, organizations and <br />corporations use IRV to elect leaders. <br />Whom does IRV advantage? IRV advantages the majority, since it <br />ensures that a minority of voters can never defeat a candidate <br />supported by a majority. It also gives the voter more power, since s/he <br />can express a range of choices. <br />Can the voting equipment handle IRV? Modern voting equipment, <br />such as optical scanners and computer touch screens, can handle IRV <br />at no additional cost. Older technologies such as punch cards and lever <br />machines cannot handle IRV, so it doesn't make sense to adopt IRV <br />until new equipment is purchased. In these cases, we recommend <br />legislation authorizing the use of IRV when the equipment is available. <br />For reasons unrelated to IRV, the trend in voting equipment is away <br />from the older technologies, so more and more jurisdictions are <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />http://www. fairvote.org/irv/faq.htm l ; �3;���d <br />