My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0112_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0112_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:06:31 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:39:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/12/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IRV Fairer <br />�� <br />. <br />,�. r _ <br />,� ��.�� �_ ��1�,, �i <br />��; � � � �s,��� <br />�. , ,r <br />.x� ,�.�w,..�. <br />,� {��' ��_sa :.� <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />s���a:n <br />Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) <br />A Fairer Way to Conduct Single-Winner Elections <br />by the Center for Voting and Democracy <br />� <br />Most U.S. elections are held under plurality voting rules in which the <br />candidate with the most votes wins. If three or more candidates run in the <br />race, then the winner can have less than a majority of the vote. But the <br />question always arises: was that winning candidate really preferred by most <br />voters? <br />x ° <br />�S 'i� . r c��• 6 <br />��� :��.f Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) is a sensible reform for elections where one <br />person wins. Examples include elections for governors, mayors, legislatures <br />��'=?�� ?�r using single-seat districts, and US president (for allocation of Electoral <br />College electors). Instant Runoff Voting is better than plurality elections <br />because: <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />it ensures the election of the candidate preferred by most voters <br />it eliminates the problem of spoiler candidatesknocking off major <br />candidates <br />it frees communities of voters from splitting their vote among their <br />own candidates <br />it promotes coalition-building and more positive campaigning <br />IRV is also better than "two-round" runoff or primary elections, which often <br />result in a change in voter turnout between the two rounds. IRV finishes the <br />job with one election, which means that <br />� election officials and taxpayers don't have to foot the bill for a second <br />election <br />� candidates don't have to raise money for two races, providing some <br />campaign finance reform <br />� the decisive election occurs when voter turnout is highest <br />How IRV Works: Each voter has one vote, and ranks candidates in order of <br />choice (1, 2, 3, etc.). The counting of ballots simulates a series of run-off <br />elections. All first choices are counted, and if no candidate wins a majority of <br />first choices, then the last place candidate (candidate with the least first- <br />choices) is eliminated. Ballots of voters who ranked the eliminated candidate <br />first then are redistributed to their next-choice candidates, as indicated on <br />each voter's ballot. Last place candidates are successively eliminated and <br />ballots are redistributed to next choices until one candidate remains or a <br />candidate gains over 50°/o of votes. <br />Voters have the option to rank as many or as few candidates as they wish- <br />their favorite candidate first, their next favorite second and so on. Voters <br />have every incentive to vote for their favorite candidate rather than the <br />"lesser of two evils" because their ballot can still count toward a winner if <br />h�:� � �si r�+�t� ,�r� ir�r.�aYi;�ir�r �•a}�.htirr� � ����� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.