Laserfiche WebLink
The History of IRV <br />�� <br />rti-3�i� J ��J,-_.',-- <br />. _ :� r <br />�'�.�� l -_ _ _ <br />`��=�=� �;���'-fi'� <br />.,,..Y <br />��a 4 '^ --� <br />'G'�i �:r1. � � <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />The History of Instant Runoff Voting <br />The key the to the development of instant runoff voting (IRV) was <br />the invention of the single transferable vote (STV) in the 1850's by <br />Thomas Hare in England and Carl Andrae in Denmark. The essence <br />of STV is the concept that a citizen would have one vote in a <br />particular contest, but that that vote might be transferred from one <br />candidate to another according to each voter's ranking of <br />candidates, depending on the aggregate result of other voters' <br />ballots. Hare devised this balloting and counting procedure in <br />creating a system of proportional representation. <br />.y .r <br />�}�ti i� -. . <br />.,� IRV, however, is not a system of proportional representation. <br />���'-� r�_ `-��" Instead, IRV uses the STV innovation in a winner-take-all context. <br />Instant runoff voting, using a preference ballot, was invented by an <br />American, W. R. Ware, a Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of <br />Technology, around 1870. The first known use of IRV in a <br />governmental election was in 1893 in Queensland, Australia. <br />However, this was a modified version of IRV in which all <br />candidates except the top two were eliminated in a batch rather than <br />sequentially, as in the pure form of IRV. The "staggered runoff <br />concept that we understand today as IRV was first used in Western <br />Australia in 1908. <br />IRV, called "alternative vote" in Australia, came to be used in most <br />Australian legislative elections, although it was superseded by <br />Hare's STV system of proportional representation for the federal <br />Senate. IRV is still used for electing members of the lower house. <br />IRV is also used in other nations, such as Ireland. In the United <br />Kingdom, the Jenkins Commission, appointed by the new <br />government, released their report October 29 that recommends the <br />use of IRV for electing the House of Commons (with proportional <br />representation achieved through the election of additional members <br />based on the popular vote for parties nationally). <br />In the United States, IRV election laws were first adopted in 1912. <br />Four states -- Florida, Indiana, Maryland, and Minnesota -- used <br />versions of IRV for party primaries. Seven other states, used a <br />different version of preference voting known as the Bucklin system. <br />Bucklin was found to be defective as it allowed a voter's second- <br />choice vote to help defeat a voter's first-choice candidate. With <br />Bucklin voting, most voters refrained from giving second choices, <br />and the intent of discovering which candidate was favored by a <br />majority of voters was thwarted. <br />Of the four states with IRV, only the Maryland law used the <br />standard IRV sequential elimination of bottom candidates, while the <br />others used batch elimination of all but the top two candidates. After <br />hL[p:r';�£airvotc.or��e��f�ri_��ierhisl�ry.f�[��� L r8?�� <br />