Laserfiche WebLink
2660 Civic Center Drive <br />DATE <br />TO: <br />January 7,2004 <br />Citv Council <br />Date: O1/12J04 <br />Item: 9. F. <br />T Utility <br />�� � <br />} � � <br />�l�rn� <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 (651)792-7003 • fax: (651)792-7040 <br />FROM: Duane Schwartz, Public Works [�i��� � <br />651-792-7041 <br />Debra B1oom, Assistant Public Works Director <br />651-792-7042 <br />SUBJECT: Discussion of Transportation Utility Legislation <br />Whi1e a11 cities face major challenges in providing funding for street improvements and maintenance, mature <br />cities must find ways to provide an appropriate 1eve1 of maintenance and establish a cost effective construction <br />and reconstruction program. Because of the limitations of special assessments, general fund appropriations and <br />other potential funding sources, most of these cities �ind it extremely difficult to develop a�inancing program to <br />fund the needed improvement and maintenance program. The City En�ineer's Association, Minnesota Public <br />Works Association, and the League of Minnesota Cities,�'mtroducing legislation during the 2004 session that <br />would enable Cities to establish a"TransportationUtility". <br />A Transportation Utility is a system for raising money to support road and bridge maintenance and construction. <br />This money would be dedicated to transportation infrastructure maintenance and reconstruction. The fees are <br />calculated based on the amount of traffic generated. The term "utility" is employed because it is similar to a <br />storm'sewer utility which allocates storm water draina�e system costs to property owners based on the volume of <br />storm runoff draining, from their properties. <br />Under a transportation utility, roadway users pay for roadway costs based on their use. Speci�ic allocation <br />systems can vary; however, the basic approach is to charge properties based on the traffic they generate. Factors <br />to consider include the number of employees, frequency of commute and the availability of other trafiic <br />management strategies, such as subsidized mass transit, carpooling, etc. <br />Roseville has positioned itself to maintain its existing 1oca1 street infrastructure through the establishment of our <br />Street Infrastructure Replacement Fund. This fund wi11 meet the needs of non-MSA 1oca1 street we11 into the <br />foreseeable future. <br />State Aid funds available to inner ring suburbs have been shrinking due to expansion of infrastructure and <br />population growth in outer ring suburbs- The revenues collected to support State �1��J funding have not kept up to <br />this growth and expansion, resulting in fewer dollars per State Aid mile distributed to cities. We expect this to <br />have an impact on our ability to cover the 1oca1 share of county and state road improvements within Roseville in <br />We are also seeing an increasing expectation of 1oca1 participation in county and state transportation <br />improvements. This wi11 also increase competition for already stretched 1oca1 resources. Access management and <br />safety improvement projects could be jeopardized by lack of funding resources. <br />