My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0112_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0112_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:06:31 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:39:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/12/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION <br />DATE: O1 / 12/04 <br />ITEM NO: 6. D• <br />Department Approval: Agenda Section: <br />DPW DISCUSSION <br />Item Description: Amendment to text of Business Zoning Districts within City Code <br />Section 1005 {PF3527) <br />1.0 BACKGROUND: <br />1.1 The Planning Commission, Council and staff have been completing a systematic rewrite <br />of outdated portions of the City Code for three past three years. Attached is the draft of an <br />ordinance which would modify the Business Zoning District language and format. The <br />new form consolidated the dimensional requirements on one page {page 2) and also <br />consolidates the land uses allowed in each district into one standard chart, similar to the <br />work that was done earlier for the Residential Zoning Text. One of the obvious <br />advantages is that it reduces the repetitiveness of the Business Zoning text by <br />consolidation. In addition, it allows users to view a comparison of what other business <br />districts uses might be allowed (or prohibited). No significant changes have been made to <br />the dimensional requirements have been made. <br />1.2 This amendment, if passed, would eliminate approximately forty percent of the duplicated <br />text in this section of the code. Fore example, the uses are replicated by distance to a state <br />or federal highway. This is old language done when the city was still full of undeveloped <br />land near such roads. Today, the community is 99% developed and this separation issue <br />does not apply. <br />1.3 Staff has added the definitions for each zoning district section, providing a clearer <br />understanding of the uses which should be allowed therein. B-2 through B-4 and SC are <br />primarily retail use areas and should be characterized as such in the land use charts. B-1 is <br />a on-retail, limited office and B-1B is a limited office and retail area, both are near <br />residential uses, A B-6 zone is a mixed use Business Parlc that requires PUDs to make <br />them effective. <br />2.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: <br />Discussion and direction as needed. <br />Report Prepared by: Dennis Welsch, (65l -792-7071) <br />Attachment: Proposed Ordinance and FINAL version <br />�� k��clur�Y�'�xznD�es��!`��nnin�7�onr�.Ple�: e�Files�3500-3549`3527_Business Zoning TextAmendment-Section 1005�RCDD-Pf3527 Business <br />District Amendment(011204).dac <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.