My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0126_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0126_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 8:42:32 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:39:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
514
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — O1/12/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 8 <br />the true cost of inspections. <br />Mayor Klausing requested supporting data from staff's research. <br />Mr. Loftus advised that he did not have the research information <br />compiled in a list, and had received much of it through state and <br />regional �re meetings with other entities. <br />Councilmember Maschka questioned whether that comparison <br />information would be beneficial on other fee schedule revisions <br />as well. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that the availability of that <br />informationwould be beneficial for justification to the public. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that he was of the impression that the <br />Council had already provided direction to staff to bring back <br />comparison information. <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted that he was not necessarily <br />looking for comparison information from cities of similar size, <br />but also from neighboring communities in the immediate area. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, given current budget constraints, it <br />was prudent for government to look more closely at services <br />provided, and define those that were not feasible to apportion <br />specifically and those that should be specifically apportioned to <br />those using the services. <br />Further discussion included the costs defined by the Finance <br />Department and incorporated into the recommended fees by the <br />Fire Department; expansion of the comparison area to <br />accommodate mall operations; the need for staff and Council to <br />review regulatory fees by specific area, rather than overall at one <br />time, due to the numerous fees involved, and staff time required <br />for research and background information to the Council; and <br />implementation of revised fees by resolution, no matter when <br />reviewed, on an annual basis, preferably January 1 of each year. <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 Victoria Street N <br />Related to a previous Council discussion regarding identification <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.