My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0126_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0126_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 8:42:32 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:39:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
514
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — O1/12/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 <br />in the treatment costs, in addition to an expected increase in the <br />City's own operating costs of five percent (5%), placing pressure <br />on the rates for those specific enterprise funds to keep up with <br />increased operating and capital costs. Mr. Miller reviewed <br />comparison charts for each enterprise fund with the 2003 base <br />rates, and proposed 2004 base rates that would recognize the <br />factors outlined above. Mr. Miller noted that the proposed <br />adjustments represented an approximate 3.8% rate increase to the <br />City's residential customers. <br />Councilmember Maschka sought clarification from staff <br />regarding status of the City's Pavement Management Program <br />(PMP) and capital improvements completed to-date on the storm <br />sewer system. <br />Staff confirmed that residential areas were essentially completed; <br />with the County Road C project, fulfilling Phase II standards on <br />regional ponds, and other unfunded mandates to meet state and <br />federal requirements. <br />Both Finance Director Miller and Assistant Public Works <br />Director Deb Bloom confirmed that the City had made good <br />progress to-date, and with continuation for another 2— 3 years of <br />a healthy capital replacement plan, the City should stay on track. <br />Further discussion included potential Arona site and Twin Lakes <br />redevelopment projects and their impact on enterprise funds; <br />ongoing periodic maintenance for sediment removal in regional <br />ponds; continuing changes for storm water quality regulations; <br />and staffs work with neighborhoods on backyard drainage issues <br />that represent small projects and minimal costs. <br />Councilmember Schroeder addressed the need for the City to <br />implement an I and I(Inflow and Infiltration) program for <br />inspecting and monitoring sump pump installations and roof <br />drainage to reduce influent for wastewater treatment of clean <br />water from residential and commercial sources. <br />Mayor Klausing and Councilmembers sought further information <br />from Councilmember Schroeder; and he further explained the <br />need to separate groundwater and sanitary sewer drainage prior <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.