Laserfiche WebLink
It's worth noting, that the strengths noted above resulted in the City earning a bond rating (also <br />known as a credit rating) that places the City in the top 5% of all cities nationally. <br />Weaknesses <br />Despite the City's excellent overall financial strength, it is faced with a structural budget deficit <br />in its core functions. This deficit was triggered by a reduction in the general purpose state-aid <br />the City receives from the State. In response to its own budget crisis, the State rescinded the <br />City's state aid of $700,000 for 2003 and 2004. Although the City has enacted some budget cuts, <br />a structural deficit of approximately $400,000 remains, and will continue unless the City makes <br />further spending reductions or establishes new funding sources. <br />The City also has two other financial weaknesses that are inherent to most local units of <br />government. The first is that cities are generally risk-averse. Because much of the services the <br />City provides are funded with involuntary payments, the City is generally asked to use the <br />monies only in the direct provision of services. There is minimal support by the general public <br />to spend monies on areas that would be considered `research and development' . <br />There is little tolerance in pursuing initiatives that have a wide ranging risk-reward relationship. <br />`Speculative' spending is typically frowned upon at the local level. In addition, local units of <br />government, including Roseville are generally focused on short-term goals and objectives. This <br />is partly due to our state-mandated fiscal cycle, and our organizational structure. It's also due to <br />the acknowledgementthat the general public oftentimes expects current resources to provide for <br />current services at the local level. This is in contrast to federal or state government where there <br />is a greater acceptance for setting aside monies for long-term objectives such as education, <br />pensions, Medicare, etc. <br />This is not to suggest that the City doesn't engage in long-term planning — we do. Nor does it <br />suggest that we have not been setting aside resources for future use — we do that also. Rather it <br />indicates that the City's overall efforts are focused on the near-term and on generally accepted <br />and highly-visible services. <br />Opportunities <br />The City of Roseville has numerous cooperative agreements with other local units of <br />government. Some of these cooperative efforts have been in place for many years, which <br />suggests that the partnerships have been successful. These cooperative agreements include; <br />recreation facilities, information technology, street maintenance, and others. Recognizing past <br />successes, the City should consider expanding these kinds of efforts. Given the challenging <br />budget times and in recognizing economies of scale and similar missions held by local <br />governments, opportunities for cooperative agreements should continue to be explored. <br />For the past decade, the City has emphasized investments in new technologies. In recent years, <br />the City has successfully leveraged its investment in the Institutional Network (I-net) by sharing <br />IT support services across the I-Net to other communities. The City also recently installed a new <br />internet-based telephone system that substantially increased our functionality while reducing on- <br />going telephone service costs by 50%. Increasingly popular wireless technologies and `virtual <br />office' capabilities could have an even more dramatic and positive effect on our service delivery <br />process. With continued emphasis on technology spending, a 24x7x365 government will <br />continue to materialize. <br />3 <br />