Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting — O1/26/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 5 <br />regarding off-sale facilities; referencing his recent e-mail to <br />Councilmembers regarding per capita liquor stores in <br />Roseville. <br />Mr. Cross further encouraged Councilmembers to do a <br />radius study and consider limiting the number of licenses <br />issued to help preserve the business interests of the small <br />business retailer. Mr. Cross cited the pressures of big box <br />stores and compliance issues when the ratio of licenses to <br />enforcement efforts was skewed. Mr. Cross opined that <br />grocery and convenience stores were often in violation of <br />compliance sales; noted the wonderful job to-date by the <br />City of Roseville in compliance issues, and cautioned <br />deviating from that past record. <br />3. Consider Consent Items Consent Items <br />At the request of Mayor Klausing, City Manager Beets briefly <br />reviewed those items being approved under the Consent Agenda. <br />Prior to adoption of the Consent Agenda, Councilmember Kough <br />requested clarification from staff on the Shardlow contract <br />regarding consulting services to the proposed Twin Lakes <br />Advisory Panel, and if the contract amount of $77,000 was all- <br />inclusive, or if there would be additional costs. Councilmember <br />Kough also questioned the reporting methods used by Mr. <br />Shardlow for the Council's information. <br />Community Development Director Dennis Welsh responded that <br />the contract would include facilitation of twelve (12) meetings, <br />and related work through July of 2004; noting that there may be <br />some minor cost additions (i.e., phone, travel, etc.) that would <br />be billed on a monthly basis, and come before the Council for <br />information and action. Mr. Welsh further responded that the <br />Council would see periodic progress and financial reports during <br />the process. <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 Victoria Street N <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn referred to City Resolution No. 9372 related to <br />the appointment process used for Commission appointments, and <br />questioned the Council's intent on following that resolution for <br />Consent Agenda Item 3.14, Appointment of a Board Member to <br />