My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0223_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0223_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:34:59 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:40:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peter Thein <br />Honorable Mention <br />Taught by Michelle Irwin <br />Parkview Center School <br />People, Not Courts, End Segregation <br />Ixi 1954, the United States Supreme Court ended state and local laws that allowed or <br />required segregation of schools based on race. What the Supreme Court could not do was <br />�ch�ally end school segregation. People, not courts, must end school segregation. <br />The Fourteenth Amendinent to the United States Constitution (which was ratified by <br />Congress in 1868) declared that all citizens of the United States are entitled to equal protection <br />under the laws. For almost ninety years even the Supreme Court thought this did not prohibit <br />separate public schools for black children and white children. Almost thirty years after the <br />Fourteenth A�i�.endi��ent was ratified, the Supreme Court said, in Plessy v. Fe,�gusoj�, that <br />separate facilities for black people and white people were acceptable as long as they were <br />"equal." <br />A very different Supreme Court rejected the idea of "separate but equal" in the Brow>>� >>, <br />13oui•cl of Education decision in 1954. We often tlu nk of this as a case based on school segregation <br />in the South. In fact, this decision was based on a number of court cases brought on behalf of <br />black children in Kansas, South Carolina, Virginiaat�d Delaware who were not allowed to attend <br />public schools in their conunuiuties because the law either required or permitted students who <br />were black and white to attend separate public schools. The 1954 Supreme Court said a state <br />law tl��t allowed or required separate public scliools violated the equal protection clause because <br />"separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." The Sup��e111e Court declared that t10 law <br />could require or allow separate schools for black cluldren and white cl�ldren. <br />What the Supreme Coui�t could not do was � r��3€� schools integrated. Tlu•ee years after the <br />�r����.;��� decision, ����4�.a nine blacl: students tried to attend a public lugh school in Little Rock, it <br />]e:d to a cl�sh between the Governor of Arkansas, a federal judge, thousands of angry citirer�s �i n�l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.