Laserfiche WebLink
Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of caring out the strict letter of the provision.s of this <br />c�e, �e �it� co�acil sh;�ll ha}� the a���t e�� a sp�tici�c� cese �fld �fie� n��i�� <br />a�� p�rhli� �e�rin�, r�� <br />�urr�rxs�e �� �r�ere� �er�exrf and max im��.��l�.�U��al c�diti�ris �s il <br />��������� the public health, safety, and �$L��� <br />be secured andsr�bstantial i��s��:e done. <br />Further listed (quoted) below that --also in bold-- is the applicable State Statute that <br />empowers Roseville's Ordinance: <br />State Statute 462.357, sub. 6(2) provides authority for the city to �g� <br />�ue�s for variances fram the Gter„�l Qrr�}��g of thee �dinance y� <br />�5��!'�i t��li�J� �tricl �n�'�xr�emc�t w�uld ��us+c undue h;ir��hi� <br />t��ta� �f ��re��#�t�e� �uti��re t� th�e in+di�du�l ar�n+e�t� u�der <br />��u�i�er�o�t. � [o �'�►ni su�h ��ri�oc�e� on� ��hen i! i� �emua��r�i�d [h�� <br />�uc� �ctiona �Il be in ic�e� wit�l� s�jrit and intent of the ordinance, <br />"iJndue hardshin as used'n connection with the grantin� of a variattce <br />_ <br />rn�� ��ie �J�� in ���tinn rAn�ot be ou� to reasonAble u�e if Lu�,�rl u�der <br />conciitions allowed bv the o�cial controls, the plight of the landowner is is <br />due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, <br />and the variance if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />locality. � coasiderallons_alone sh 1 not cop�j��, un�ue <br />hardshi� if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the <br />ordiaanee, ,..The board or governing body as the case may be may impose <br />conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protec�" <br />Please take note of the use of the terms `uractical ditfculties'. `unusual <br />�rd��'. �nd �au�st��] ��#i� �e�r: �. IrMrr(� �t #�� sne�ir�tin� �f <br />tf�ose terms ill� the Communitv ���Staffs Rtn�r� <br />A�ide from �g'�,n ;��},� ���� <br />,...,,,a,. �,. �,.i.,.,.i.,.....� a.,. ca..,,�r.,.....� i,,.,...,.,...,,i �..,.c _.._,.,. ,... �,.,. <br />i 7 <br />�_��.�.�5 ���� ���h �e�t`. [5���s �f ��st-f��o€tio,n�,�o ar� noi �i� <br />��'un�d��#�[��� i�€ �11d� �E lk�. R�sie hr�d �he �e �xoonri�rfit� k6�� <br />harl tn he aware nf ��in� iccnec anrl hv h��vina the ���The also <br />`ba�� i��w the Qrdanance as it exisfe�l! <br />THIS REPORT DID NOT CONTAIN A SINGLE PHOTO OR <br />PERSPECTIVE FROM EITHER OF THE TWO CONTIGUOUS <br />NEIGHBORS! I HAVE INCLUDED SUCH PHOTOS, AND USING THE <br />CITIES PHOTO SHOWIl�TG 988'S ESTIMATED OUTWARD GROWTH, <br />HAVE TRIED TO SHOW BY SIMILAR USE OF PHOTO MY LOSS OF <br />VIEW ANDD PPRIVACY! <br />For example: Ms. Rose does not wish to add to the North side of her home as it <br />would interfere with her view of Lake Bennett and would cause the loss of <br />