My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0308_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0308_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:16:34 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting — 02/23/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 18 <br />Hall yard with a banner used for advertising. Mr. Kysylyczyn <br />advised that, upon his initiation, and working through former <br />City Police Chief and former City Attorney, the truck and banner <br />were ultimately removed. Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that while <br />City Attorney Anderson had addressed legal issues, he was <br />recommending that the City Council consider polity issues and <br />recommended that the City Council simply apply the same <br />standard to everyone — residents, businesses and civic <br />organizations — in allowing temporary signs. <br />Councilmember Maschka noted the historical purpose of the <br />code was based on public interest versus private interest; and that <br />too many temporary signs were being instigated in the <br />commercial area, and weren't being enforced. Councilmember <br />Maschka opined that perhaps the City would be better off with <br />no banners for any purpose. <br />Further discussion was held related to temporary signage used <br />for City events and impacts to events if the temporary <br />signage/banner advertising was not used; as well as the <br />advantages of temporary signage to advertise the upcoming <br />"Clean up the City of Roseville." <br />Parks and Recreation Director Brokke noted that special events <br />in the City would be affected. <br />Mayor Klausing recommended and spoke in support of the <br />proposed motion for the signs in question in this request; opining <br />that a future discussion may need to include those temporary <br />signs/banners used for non-commercial activities (i.e., blood <br />mobile); with further consideration given at that time to free <br />speech issues and implications. <br />Maschka moved, Ihlan seconded, approval of the 2004 sign <br />permit for City uses and promotions as listed in the 2004 Sign <br />Summary, dated January 7, 2004. <br />Councilmember Schroeder reiterated his position that the <br />Council needed to lead by example; and while the argument <br />could be made that the City was promoting the City of Roseville, <br />an individual resident, business owner, or civic organization, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.