Laserfiche WebLink
TIF Can Help the Environment and the Economy: Cleanup of contamination and <br />removal of aging, deteriorating first ring suburban properties enhances community <br />livability, image, tax base and avoids a painful cycle of more serious deterioration, <br />declining property values, crime and urban decay. The benefits of land recycling accrue <br />to the state through higher commercial taxes and income taxes, and all of the local <br />property taxing jurisdictions. Just as there are positive ripple effects created through <br />reinvestment and redevelopment, there are more serious negative ripple effects created <br />if the contamination and deferred maintenance of parcels remain. <br />The Problem: Why DevelopmentDoesn't Pay in Brownfield's - In an effort to <br />reform the property tax system a few sessions ago, the legislature lowered the tax rate <br />on commercial/industrial property. While this was a positive change in general, the <br />ability to generate revenues within Brownfield areas like Twin Lakes was greatly <br />curtailed. Property tax reform had the effect of greatly increasing the financing gap for <br />redevelopment projects such as Twin Lakes. Also, many state programs that might <br />have mitigated this problem are under- funded or in jeopardy. Last session, the <br />Govemor vetoed funding for the Redevelopment Account and the Contamination <br />Cleanup Grant Account (both DTED programs). Another State mandated fiscal policy is <br />the regional tax sharing plan called fiscal disparities. Roseville pays fiscal disparities on <br />all commercial projects developed within the community. Fiscal Disparities requires <br />some communities, like Roseville, to redistribute nearly 40% of their growth in <br />commercial property tax. This helps to fund projects where the commercial growth is <br />not as strong such as the inner cities and bedroom communities. These State policies <br />reduce the potential amount of new revenues generated by redevelopment. All these <br />factors coupled with the already high costs associated with redevelopment increases <br />the risk for developers and increases the financial gap and ability to fund the project. <br />V�(thin Twin Lakes, the contamination costs alone are estimated to be over $5 million. <br />In addition, there are over $14 million in public infrastructure costs associated with new <br />roads, interstate ramp reconfiguration and traffic lights. All added costs that a developer <br />does not have to incur on vacant, clean land. <br />� <br />