Laserfiche WebLink
Workshop # 8 — <br />DevelopmentProgram/ Land Use Alternatives <br />� . Review Of US2S 111 EXIStIngTwin Lakes Plan and <br />Potential Changes Proposed by Development Team <br />. Intensity and Characteristics Of Uses *„ <br />- LotCoverage, Height. Hours � <br />� - Traffic Generation. �k ll�e Periods � � � ' � � � <br />- Errpbyrrierrt. T�c �se � ' � <br />� . ReviewLand Use Scenario Diagrams and ' <br />_ --Implications Of Scenarios <br />° � A�arwlna �r�ih. g� 14�ve�Jrq vnu+ <br />�• 4}��luprt�ertl TaeM <br />�� • rca rrpai �, wra.N <br />Workshop # 10 — <br />Concept Plan <br />. Refine PreferredAltematives into a Conceot Plan for the Site <br />to inGude: � <br />- Roadways, ppen Spaoe, Landscaped Areas. � <br />Ponding (generally). Land Uses. Otlier Features �� <br />. Panelwill Provide Feedbackto DevelopmentTeam <br />. DevelopmeritTeam Critique of Concept Plan <br />. Introduce Issues to be Addressed through Design Standards, <br />Mitigation Strategies <br />implemerrtation Tools, Choices <br />� Post report a� <br />_ Meetingwith Staff �� Websiteand <br />in Newsletter <br />Joint Session of the Planning <br />Commission and City Council <br />�U��/ $ <br />• Optional Report DOCU1712C1t <br />� Post report a, <br />Meeting with Staff � Website and <br />in NewsleHer <br />Workshop # 9 — <br />Anal�rsis of Alternatives <br />• Summary of input from Previous Workshopswill be <br />GraphicallySynthesized and Opportunities & Constraints <br />Visualized <br />. Presentationof at least 3 Land Use Scenarios <br />• Discussion of Likes & Dislikes of Panel <br />- ID Features/Concems for Careful Design Atterition a Mitigation __ <br />Measures <br />• Development Team Participation <br />i�-•�•�• <br />: I _� <br />• ObjeCtive: Select Preferred Altemative <br />� �� � <br />� : t,1997r�D wrb� 3� � ' � ' �+►�9 �� <br />� �� � 3�ar55 <br />-- � Pa�l r4� m 45'i6�ii —'---- <br />__'�nl�r� - <br />Workshop # 11 — <br />Revised Concept Plan / Design Guidelines <br />. Refine Concept Plan based on Feedback �� <br />� <br />. Presentationof Suggested Design and . . <br />PerformanceStandardsto Address Issues and Concems <br />Reviewof Process and Presentationof Process for Next Steps <br />. Opportunities for Coritinued Participationin PUD Review and <br />Approval Process <br />� � Fbstreportm <br />I MeetingwithStaff � Websitearid <br />in Newsletter <br />Final Steps in Process <br />• PUD Submitted to the City by the Developer— <br />August 9 <br />• Planning Commission Hearing on the PUD — <br />September 8 <br />• City Council will conduct any required public <br />hearings for any required comprehensive plan <br />amendment, zoning action, subdivision <br />approval, and any proposed public financing. <br />� <br />