Laserfiche WebLink
] complicating backyard access without rna��in� th� ga�ag� further from the house. He <br />� expressed concern with sound r�tl��ian, �ie�dows are not a concern. Will there be eaves <br />� along all edges, they should l� Sls�e� �v�s. Mr. L�w� expressed concern about access to <br />� rear yard from the north �td� �t�th� s���r�. <br />� <br />�r Mrs. Dorothy Ohnsorg, 2523 Maple Lane,'�d not object, but noted garages should not be <br />� used for anything but residential uses. She''�id cars and trucks at C2 and Old Highway <br />$ 8, located at another variance site, have bees� a problem. <br />� <br />I�J Member Blank noted costs and locations (slope) are challenges. The garage is almost the <br />f I size of the house. � <br />1� <br />13 Member Peper asked if there could be a set �ck compromise along the front of the <br />]� property line — could there be an alternate s��ack? Thomas Paschke stated the staff is not <br />1� opposed to other alternatives which can be § pported by hardships. <br />I� <br />1T <br />r <br />1� <br />l� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�- <br />�� <br />Member Bakeman expressed concern about fron� yard garages and setbacks along Old <br />Highway 8; she prefers a consistent setback �'h� possible and 30 feet in this proposal. <br />Chair Mulder expressed concern about the visibility of the garage — it should be back as <br />far as possible and use gables and awnings. The hardship is the lot and slope. <br />Member Stone said the structure should use ��mi9�r materials and design whereverl <br />possible. Mr. Olson said the design and matcri�Ls �•a I E be similar to the house. <br />Chair Mulder closed the hearing. <br />��} Motion: Member Stone moved, second by t+�[�m�er Bakeman, to recommend approval <br />3� of a Variance to Section 1004.O1A7 (LocatEOr+� and. a 3 foot Variance to Section <br />31 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions — Side Yard Setback) allowing Chris Olson to <br />3� construct a 26 foot by 32 foot (832 sq. ft.� detachc�d accessory building in their front yard <br />�� at 2940 Old Highway 8, based on the findine� of ��ction 5 and the conditions of Section <br />3� 6 of the project report dated March 3,2004. <br />3� <br />3� Member Peper will not support the motion. �he garage should be closer to the front <br />�� property line. <br />3#� Motion: Member Peper moved, second by �'Iember Blank, to amend the motion to <br />3� support a variance of 6 feet to allow a 24 fe� fro�,t yard setback, rather than 30 foot <br />�� setback. <br />�L <br />�� <br />�� <br />� <br />Member Ipsen said he will oppose the �mendment; the garage should be back as far as <br />possible. <br />Ayes: 1(Should this have been 2, �cp�r and l�lank, tr� ��? <br />Nay s: 5 <br />