Laserfiche WebLink
� . � <br />" �i �i <br />Memo <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />Nea1 Beets, City Manager <br />From: Chris Miller, Finance Director <br />Date: March 29,2004 <br />Re: Discussion on the Financing Concerns for Twin Lakes <br />Date: 03/29/04 <br />Item: 8.b <br />Financing Concerns for <br />T w h Lxkes <br />Introduction <br />On March 15, 2004 the Council received a report and heard a presentation from Jim Casserly, <br />from the firm of Krass Monroe, who has been in the process of developing a proforma on the <br />Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. The report was a culmination of two years of study and <br />analysis of various development scenarios. Contained within the report was the most recent <br />estimate of financing sources and uses based on the Twin Lakes Master Development Plan. A <br />copy of the proforma is included as Attachment A. The report identified a financing gap of $75 <br />million for the entire redevelopment area. These gaps are assuming that the City captures the <br />maximum allotted tax increment revenue. <br />It has been known for many years that the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area is financially <br />challenged. This is evidenced by the fact that the area has seen little redevelopment in the past <br />decade, despite its prominent location. The current financing gap, as recently reported, raises <br />strong concerns over the viability of the project in its current form. In fairness to citizens and <br />potential developers, the Council is advised to address the financing gap sooner, rather than later. <br />This should not place any less value on the Twin Lakes Stakeholders Panel Study. The <br />Stakeholders deserve to have their thoughts, suggestions, and concerns heard and documented <br />for future consideration. <br />In the report, a number of potential strategies were identified that could potentially reduce or <br />eliminate the gap. However, these strategies would require a significant policy shift on many <br />fronts, which leads to a number of financial concerns. These policy shifts and related concerns <br />include: <br />a� The proposed use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is substantial and requires a change <br />in policy. <br />�} Funding for Twin Lakes Parkway outside of the project is problematic. <br />�.j The proposed use of special assessments may require a change in policy. <br />�} Reducing monies set aside for contingency purposes is ill-advised under circumstances <br />which are at great risk for cost fluctuations. <br />c� Issuing large amounts of debt, places the City's credit rating and overall financial strength <br />at risk The type of debt scheduled to be issued would require a change in policy. <br />f� Taking Fiscal Disparities outside the TIF District would require a change in policy. <br />�p Condemnation may be necessary, but it carries risk, and might require a change in policy. <br />