My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0517_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0517_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:15:34 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:41:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Town Hall Meeting — 04/03/04 <br />Minutes - Page 11 <br />Ms. McGehee challenged the City Council with the <br />question: "How does the City Council worlc to get more <br />citizen involvement in the processes going on in Roseville; <br />and how can the City Council find out how the rest of the <br />City feels about these things?" Ms. McGehee expressed <br />her disappointment in the MarchlApril 2004 issue of the <br />Roseville Wrap, and its lacic of pertinent information about <br />significant issues (i i., upcoming Special municipal <br />election and Twin Lalces development); and also noted that, <br />while the public is invited to attend the Twin Lalces <br />Stalceholder's Panel meetings, and there were many <br />residents interested in the proposed project, there's little <br />effort made to inform them of that possibility. Ms. <br />McGehee opined that many residents were not "wired," and <br />couldn't access the Website for information. Ms. McGehee <br />concluded by aslcing for financial information on the <br />Roseville City Hall construction project. <br />Mayor Klausing addressed how to get involved: suggesting <br />citizen advisory commissions were a great way to get <br />involved and suggested prospective applicants solicit <br />information from City Hall. Mayor Klausing reviewed <br />various advisory commissions currently in existence and <br />other ways that the City Council and staff sought to <br />increase public awareness. <br />Councilmember Maschlca acicnowledged that public <br />involvement and information was always a struggle for the <br />City Council. Councilmember Maschlca questioned <br />whether it was time for another "Vista 2000," study that <br />would incorporate massive planning over the next 10 years. <br />Councilmember Maschlca opined his support of citizen taslc <br />forces and advisory committees, recognizing the balance <br />their implementation with staff and financial resources. <br />Councilmember Maschlca noted the massive redevelopment <br />nature of the Twin Lalces proj ect and reviewed the <br />proposed development area for public awareness; noting <br />the potential for an additional $4.5 million tax base, while <br />costing approximately $150,000 to study the project, <br />whether it comes to fiuition or not. Councilmember <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.