Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />r <br />, <br />� <br />Ciiy of Roseville, Minnesota <br />Financing Tools and Concepts <br />This section discusses various methods to finance the public improvements <br />required for new development and redevelopment projects. There are usually at <br />least two components to finance: (1) infrastructure such as utilities, streets and <br />roads necessary to allow access and service, and (2) a negotiated assistance <br />package related to public improvements directly benefiting the project. <br />The infrastructure for new residential properties is usually built to support a <br />development area, and the cost per lot is folded into the lot or home selling pnce. <br />The costs and requirements for a typical lot are fairly standard. For large <br />commercial properties, the infrastructure required is negotiated along with plan <br />review and approval. The necessary parking, size of pipes, signage and required <br />access are agreed to, along with agreement on how much the developer must pay <br />for these improvements. The portion benefiting only the new development is <br />generally paid by the developer, and the impr,ovements that may help the <br />developer but also improve the area for future and existing properties are typically <br />shared or paid by the City. <br />Negotiated redevelopment assistance is generally reserved for highly desirable <br />developments that meet the City's criteria for tax base growth, job creation, <br />affordable housing, community service, or a particular business segment the City <br />has been targeting. The tax increment act, abatement act, and grant programs <br />limit the items that the City may pay for, and include public improvements such as <br />acquisition, demolition, relocation, land, parking, landscaping, infrastructure, <br />sidewalks, etc. The level of assistance may be determined by specific public <br />improvements to be funded by the City, a percentage of value, or a flat dollar <br />amount, as long as it is used to pay for public improvements. I n the case of Twin <br />Lakes, assistance is required to level the playing field with vacant, development- <br />ready parcels of property in other parts af the metropolitan area. <br />� The financing tools below address vanous methods the City may employ to initially <br />finance the improvements, or to reimburse the developer for public improvements, <br />based on certain assistance provided to the redevelopment project. While ideally <br />it would be useful to assign a nsk spectrum to the tools listed in this section, this is <br />� not possible without answering a significant number of questions about a <br />particular develo pment. We fell that this process, without s pecific critena <br />addressing other hypothetical variables, can be very subjective and therefore <br />� limited in its usefulness. We have, however, provided general commentary <br />regarding the perceived nsk of each of the financing tools listed. <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />c <br />� <br />.� SPRINGSTED <br />1. Pay as You Go (PAYGO) <br />Tax Increment may be used to repay the developer for public improvements on a <br />pay as you go basis, or to pay debt service on Tax Increment revenue bonds. Pay <br />as you go financing consists af an agreement between the City (or Authority) and <br />the developer, to make payments to the developer each year based on actual TI <br />(Tax Increment) collections that year. Only tax increment generated from the <br />project is used for repayment, so if there is not enough increment annually or in <br />total to repay the developer for all of the costs agreed upon including interest, the <br />City (or Authority) is not obligated to make up the difference. <br />Cities that offer bonds or guaranteed reimbursements may be looked upon more <br />favorably by developers searching for a financially viable site. <br />Ra�e 15 <br />